Well it's kept me out of mischief this week whilst it has been too wet to play in the garden, and I have honed my imaging skills I'm not too sure myself over all of Michael's date widths, some are very minor, but one could argue that they do represent different dies, even though there was no intent for a design change. We probably need a hierarchy of varieties DELIBERATE: Actual changes to the design, the Peck, Freeman, Gouby Die descriptions (this would include the large and small dates in 1874-7 and 1879, plus the varieties in 1895, 1897 and 1911 and the recessed ears 1915-6, etc) INCIDENTAL: Repairs and repunches (I'd include the "minor" date spacings here, but also the N over Z and overdates) ACCIDENTAL: Missing serifs, F for E, filled letters etc; Flaws:- O'NE, bird's foot etc Not too sure where one puts things like the 1903 with an open 3, we have no way of knowing whether there was a deliberate attempt to change the font, or just someone picked up a 3 punch that was intended for some foreign issue I've been scanning my accumulation for fun, but some of these "varieties" are attracting real money, so someone loves them! David