scott

yea ok

part of the furniture would be better

yea, wish the market here was like that, pennies in that grade are going for way over book price

i cant, thats zoomed in off the image itself already, the smaller image shows the shape of a B though. if i could get it sharper i would, i might see if i can.

yes thats the dome on, in the packaging

yes they are legal tender but they wern't minted for circulation and therfore you can judge rarity. if you want to include £5 coins, this one is worth the most whether there were less of these minted then any other coin though..

havn't the foggiest, perhaps they used the wrong letter by mistake, but you can see there is a join at the bottom

there is that 2nd type of 2006 10p, though. but yea dont worry about those.. yet lol would the 1992 small head 20 be a mule of sorts? using 1991 dyes instead of the updated?

yea B over R.. not 100% due to the fact it looks normal without an visual aids, but that is quite clear. i want thoughts on that, is it a new type

but those do count, there were 3,910,000 royal arms £1 in 2008 (thats the old type) no £5 were made for circulation. and the commonwealth games variertys were all issed for circulation so those stand

i have a dot to dot 1992 10p and 2 of the small head 1992 20p 80's-90's 20ps are hard to get nowadays got this one a few months back, have to say i'm pleased lol

isn\'t this sort of thing common with farthings, its quite nice having an obvious misalignment though. and off the subject of 1847 i have 1843 FID . rather then FID : its posted here, but i may have a very interesting repunch indeed for my latest arrival, my large date 1858. was acctually investigating the R in BRITTANIAR myself (the top of the R is acctually open there is no serif or bar up there) and spotted the repunch of a possible B over R in REG? so perhaps this was common quick fix?

nope, 2008 pounds are rarer in mintage. rarest is the NI commonwealth games £2 485,500 mintage

been a long while since anyone has found anything got the 10p and 20p

yea from that discription i get henry VIII groat too.

i am interested in seeing this

i have an interesting copper one posted around the site which is, from what i have seen completly unlisted, but yea i like the site

far less about, speaking of fake stuff

that sounds interesting, do you have pictures

i have this interesting one, its no WW (doesnt appear to be any overstriking) but has a lower colon on reverse, and oddly for a coin of this grade, some lustre O.O

yea buns are fun, dont worry about quality for some, some very rarely appear, check dates like 1875 76 and 79 (sometimes people dont list things correctly and you can find a bargain) or any coin with an obvious rare type of course.

yea i have a 1913 that looks to be the same colour as my 1912H's, i have a 1918 RM in EF with a die crack or 2

yea i'll get the pic, came in a bulk buy, you can see 3 lumps in the 5 o clock, thats the signiture

i have the ones in my penny thread, now if we are talking about something that makes no differance, this is a good example are there really many bun head pennys distinguishable in poor?, i have 2 veriaties of 1860 in poor only way i know they are differant is one has signiture under portrait

i wouldn't know a slender 3 if i had one.. i'm not measuring things.. its a dumb price for a coin. how come a slightly differant 3 is worth so much, yet there are date spreads all over the place in 60-61 and 62 which no one cares about