Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know I said one, but actually it's two..

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1817-King-George-III-Gold-Sovereign-High-Grade-unrecorded-error-1-for-I-/360884771970?pt=UK_Coins_BritishMilled_RL&hash=item5406689c82

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Extremely-Rare-1879-London-St-George-Dragon-Gold-Sovereign-R4-Marsh-/360884777869?pt=UK_Coins_BritishMilled_RL&hash=item540668b38d

They've only been on for half a day or so, one of them is apparently unrecorded. I can't even claim to be a novice in gold coins so I can't comment but I'd be interested if someone knows otherwise...

Matt

Posted

Someone tell him he's a ****. Why quote Marsh on the second item, when you can't be bothered to check the images of the 1817. Numerals are arabic 1s, missing serifs are blocked dies or broken punches. Simple. I cannot understand why people get so obsessed with infinitessimally small incremental die changes due to being used for their original purpose. I would like to claim the well deserved excessive rarity of my unmodified, struck as intended, virtually impossible to obtain normal type coin.

  • Like 1
Posted

Someone tell him he's a ****. Why quote Marsh on the second item, when you can't be bothered to check the images of the 1817. Numerals are arabic 1s, missing serifs are blocked dies or broken punches. Simple. I cannot understand why people get so obsessed with infinitessimally small incremental die changes due to being used for their original purpose. I would like to claim the well deserved excessive rarity of my unmodified, struck as intended, virtually impossible to obtain normal type coin.

I thought as much. Well put by the way :D

Posted

. I would like to claim the well deserved excessive rarity of my unmodified, struck as intended, virtually impossible to obtain normal type coin.

:) :)

Posted

Scarce coin, rare if you can find a fully struck obverse (think they may not exist) but more common that catalogue in VF-GVF. The half sov of London this 1879 date is actually equally scarce or perhaps a bit moreso with truly mint examples also quite rare. I'm thinking I may have seen more than five in the previous year...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...
Test