Thomas H Law Collection Wow!

[NRP]

I see the Thomas h law collection has fetched some phenomenal prices!!!! Just two examples, the excessively rare Henry vii sovereign $500,000 and a una and the lion $105,000 etc many more over $100,000!!!!

[Nicholas]

I've seen individual coins in collections fetch prices that never will be matched. One word - Hype.

[TomGoodheart]

http://stacksbowers.com/auctions/AuctionLots.aspx?AuctionID=192&SessionID=432

[NRP]

Every coin in this collection went very high!!

[TomGoodheart]

I notice there are a few pieces that might be of interest to bronze/cu collectors in the 20th August Stacks auction. Like this:

[Rob]

Need a link please. Unfortunately, since I replaced my computer three years ago, Outlook blocks most of what is in an email. Attachments get through IF the email gets through, but any pictures contained within the email don't and get removed by Outlook. All incoming items from Stacks (and most other salerooms) fall into this category. At least the physical catalogues are legible when I receive them.

[Peckris]

Need a link please. Unfortunately, since I replaced my computer three years ago, Outlook blocks most of what is in an email. Attachments get through IF the email gets through, but any pictures contained within the email don't and get removed by Outlook. All incoming items from Stacks (and most other salerooms) fall into this category. At least the physical catalogues are legible when I receive them.

Are you talking about the pictures here (above), Rob? I'm not sure that any email is involved? It's just either an internal attachment on this site, or a direct link to somewhere like Photobucket. I'm not sure how Outlook can block pictures on a website - I rather think you've got a browser issue.

[Rob]

Need a link please. Unfortunately, since I replaced my computer three years ago, Outlook blocks most of what is in an email. Attachments get through IF the email gets through, but any pictures contained within the email don't and get removed by Outlook. All incoming items from Stacks (and most other salerooms) fall into this category. At least the physical catalogues are legible when I receive them.

Are you talking about the pictures here (above), Rob? I'm not sure that any email is involved? It's just either an internal attachment on this site, or a direct link to somewhere like Photobucket. I'm not sure how Outlook can block pictures on a website - I rather think you've got a browser issue.

No, pictures on this website and other are fine. It is outlook telling you that outlook blocked the pictures to protect your privacy but they can be downloaded by right-clicking. This is complete b****cks. If it wanted to protect my privacy, all it has to do is stop the emails. This happens too often anyway such as failing to recognise an email from the wife in another room of the house is probably legitimate. Having decided to allow the email through, outlook should include all the content. I haven't got time to download everything separately because I probably get 20-30 a day, so all these emails get binned. If outlook decides a BT or CNG logo is pornographic or whatever reason and not fit for the eyes of a broad minded 55 year old it blocks it, there's no hope.

[TomGoodheart]

Need a link please. Unfortunately, since I replaced my computer three years ago, Outlook blocks most of what is in an email. Attachments get through IF the email gets through, but any pictures contained within the email don't and get removed by Outlook. All incoming items from Stacks (and most other salerooms) fall into this category. At least the physical catalogues are legible when I receive them.

http://stacksbowers.com/auctions/auctionlots.aspx?auctionid=192&sessionid=436

Link to the August sale. It starts with page 10 as that's where the British coins commence but you should be able to search from there for anything else.

[Peckris]

Need a link please. Unfortunately, since I replaced my computer three years ago, Outlook blocks most of what is in an email. Attachments get through IF the email gets through, but any pictures contained within the email don't and get removed by Outlook. All incoming items from Stacks (and most other salerooms) fall into this category. At least the physical catalogues are legible when I receive them.

Are you talking about the pictures here (above), Rob? I'm not sure that any email is involved? It's just either an internal attachment on this site, or a direct link to somewhere like Photobucket. I'm not sure how Outlook can block pictures on a website - I rather think you've got a browser issue.

No, pictures on this website and other are fine. It is outlook telling you that outlook blocked the pictures to protect your privacy but they can be downloaded by right-clicking. This is complete b****cks. If it wanted to protect my privacy, all it has to do is stop the emails. This happens too often anyway such as failing to recognise an email from the wife in another room of the house is probably legitimate. Having decided to allow the email through, outlook should include all the content. I haven't got time to download everything separately because I probably get 20-30 a day, so all these emails get binned. If outlook decides a BT or CNG logo is pornographic or whatever reason and not fit for the eyes of a broad minded 55 year old it blocks it, there's no hope.

I should change from Outlook to Windows Live, or Outlook's 'big brother' Exchange , if I were you. Apple's Mail "hides" images in any email it's marked as Junk, but if you click Not Junk, the images are all there, and next time it won't mark that sender as Junk.

[Rob]

Need a link please. Unfortunately, since I replaced my computer three years ago, Outlook blocks most of what is in an email. Attachments get through IF the email gets through, but any pictures contained within the email don't and get removed by Outlook. All incoming items from Stacks (and most other salerooms) fall into this category. At least the physical catalogues are legible when I receive them.

http://stacksbowers.com/auctions/auctionlots.aspx?auctionid=192&sessionid=436

Link to the August sale. It starts with page 10 as that's where the British coins commence but you should be able to search from there for anything else.

Thanks Richard. I see that lot 34819 is yet another incorrect slab attribution. P1243 instead of 1233 for anyone who wants to know. 34805 is worth chasing if anyone wants a DH11 with guilloche edge. A lot harder than the 966 and that looks a nice example.

[Rob]

Need a link please. Unfortunately, since I replaced my computer three years ago, Outlook blocks most of what is in an email. Attachments get through IF the email gets through, but any pictures contained within the email don't and get removed by Outlook. All incoming items from Stacks (and most other salerooms) fall into this category. At least the physical catalogues are legible when I receive them.

Are you talking about the pictures here (above), Rob? I'm not sure that any email is involved? It's just either an internal attachment on this site, or a direct link to somewhere like Photobucket. I'm not sure how Outlook can block pictures on a website - I rather think you've got a browser issue.

No, pictures on this website and other are fine. It is outlook telling you that outlook blocked the pictures to protect your privacy but they can be downloaded by right-clicking. This is complete b****cks. If it wanted to protect my privacy, all it has to do is stop the emails. This happens too often anyway such as failing to recognise an email from the wife in another room of the house is probably legitimate. Having decided to allow the email through, outlook should include all the content. I haven't got time to download everything separately because I probably get 20-30 a day, so all these emails get binned. If outlook decides a BT or CNG logo is pornographic or whatever reason and not fit for the eyes of a broad minded 55 year old it blocks it, there's no hope.

I should change from Outlook to Windows Live, or Outlook's 'big brother' Exchange , if I were you. Apple's Mail "hides" images in any email it's marked as Junk, but if you click Not Junk, the images are all there, and next time it won't mark that sender as Junk.

Don't have the alternatives on my computer, but it isn't worth buying them unless I know it will solve the problem. What someone needs to come up with is an intelligent facility for the user to tell microsoft who is acceptable & who not. If the system was able to learn from your assigning junk/not junk status to a sender, there would be little need for outlook to block most of those things it currently does.

[Peckris]

Need a link please. Unfortunately, since I replaced my computer three years ago, Outlook blocks most of what is in an email. Attachments get through IF the email gets through, but any pictures contained within the email don't and get removed by Outlook. All incoming items from Stacks (and most other salerooms) fall into this category. At least the physical catalogues are legible when I receive them.

Are you talking about the pictures here (above), Rob? I'm not sure that any email is involved? It's just either an internal attachment on this site, or a direct link to somewhere like Photobucket. I'm not sure how Outlook can block pictures on a website - I rather think you've got a browser issue.

No, pictures on this website and other are fine. It is outlook telling you that outlook blocked the pictures to protect your privacy but they can be downloaded by right-clicking. This is complete b****cks. If it wanted to protect my privacy, all it has to do is stop the emails. This happens too often anyway such as failing to recognise an email from the wife in another room of the house is probably legitimate. Having decided to allow the email through, outlook should include all the content. I haven't got time to download everything separately because I probably get 20-30 a day, so all these emails get binned. If outlook decides a BT or CNG logo is pornographic or whatever reason and not fit for the eyes of a broad minded 55 year old it blocks it, there's no hope.

I should change from Outlook to Windows Live, or Outlook's 'big brother' Exchange , if I were you. Apple's Mail "hides" images in any email it's marked as Junk, but if you click Not Junk, the images are all there, and next time it won't mark that sender as Junk.

Don't have the alternatives on my computer, but it isn't worth buying them unless I know it will solve the problem. What someone needs to come up with is an intelligent facility for the user to tell microsoft who is acceptable & who not. If the system was able to learn from your assigning junk/not junk status to a sender, there would be little need for outlook to block most of those things it currently does.

Windows Live is the free default Microsoft email client now. For some reason they don't include it on new machines (or didn't, for Windows 7) but you can download it for free.