Paulus Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 Hurry if you want it! 10 minutes to go (ends 18:26:49)http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/121065592867?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2648 Quote
HistoricCoinage Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 Stuart and I were talking about this the other day, nice dress but a horrible cleaning job. I'd pass. Quote
Peckris Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 Hurry if you want it! 10 minutes to go (ends 18:26:49)http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/121065592867?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2648OMG - I opened up and read your post, had a look at the time on my computer, and it said !8:26:48 !!! (Good job I am not interested in Lizzy 1 coins ) Quote
jaggy Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 Nice coin. Probably VF judging by the photo. I have one that is very similar (my 'rose' looks smaller). Final price seems about right. Fair but not a bargain.Just my 6d worth Quote
Paulus Posted February 18, 2013 Author Posted February 18, 2013 I must admit I thought it better than VF, but very noticeably cleaned Quote
jaggy Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 I must admit I thought it better than VF, but very noticeably cleanedAgree on the cleaning. On further thought, that probably brings the value down and makes it overpriced.I bought mine (Elizabeth I - Milled coinage; large bust, cross fourchèe, small rose, mm.star) at auction (many years ago) and it was graded at VF+then. While it is always hard to tell from a photo, I thought mine was just a bit better than the ebay one hence why I felt that one might be a VF. Maybe mine is conservatively graded. Quote
Paulus Posted February 18, 2013 Author Posted February 18, 2013 I must admit I thought it better than VF, but very noticeably cleanedAgree on the cleaning. On further thought, that probably brings the value down and makes it overpriced.I bought mine (Elizabeth I - Milled coinage; large bust, cross fourchèe, small rose, mm.star) at auction (many years ago) and it was graded at VF+then. While it is always hard to tell from a photo, I thought mine was just a bit better than the ebay one hence why I felt that one might be a VF. Maybe mine is conservatively graded.What do others think? Should it be graded under hammered standards, or early milled, or somewhere in between?! Could we see a pic of your Jaggy? Quote
jaggy Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 I must admit I thought it better than VF, but very noticeably cleanedAgree on the cleaning. On further thought, that probably brings the value down and makes it overpriced.I bought mine (Elizabeth I - Milled coinage; large bust, cross fourchèe, small rose, mm.star) at auction (many years ago) and it was graded at VF+then. While it is always hard to tell from a photo, I thought mine was just a bit better than the ebay one hence why I felt that one might be a VF. Maybe mine is conservatively graded.What do others think? Should it be graded under hammered standards, or early milled, or somewhere in between?! Could we see a pic of your Jaggy?This is my coin Quote
jaggy Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 Sorry about the second pic being so big. Still trying to work out this photo malarkey. Quote
Paulus Posted February 18, 2013 Author Posted February 18, 2013 Sorry about the second pic being so big. Still trying to work out this photo malarkey.One to rival Azda's biggest plates! Very nice indeed! Quote
Peckris Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 I must admit I thought it better than VF, but very noticeably cleanedAgree on the cleaning. On further thought, that probably brings the value down and makes it overpriced.I bought mine (Elizabeth I - Milled coinage; large bust, cross fourchèe, small rose, mm.star) at auction (many years ago) and it was graded at VF+then. While it is always hard to tell from a photo, I thought mine was just a bit better than the ebay one hence why I felt that one might be a VF. Maybe mine is conservatively graded.What do others think? Should it be graded under hammered standards, or early milled, or somewhere in between?! Could we see a pic of your Jaggy?I'm no fan of hammered (post-Saxon) but that one is gorgeous - like an early milled coin and beautifully toned. In fact, if you hadn't referred to it as hammered I would have sworn it was milled. (Oh wait - I just read the description - it IS milled ). Quote
Red Riley Posted February 19, 2013 Posted February 19, 2013 What do others think? Should it be graded under hammered standards, or early milled, or somewhere in between?! Could we see a pic of your Jaggy?I looked at it and immediately thought NEF. These primitive milled coins are a real hybrid but should in my opinion be graded by early milled standards, even though the cut of the portrait is very much as per the hammered series. Actually I thought £311 was on the low side despite the cleaning. Shame I didn't spot it... Quote
TomGoodheart Posted February 19, 2013 Posted February 19, 2013 My feeling is there's a bit less wear on the ebay coin, though that's trusting the photos. Compare the pearls on the bodice with Jaggy's for example. It's a shame about the cleaning, but I suspect in time with toning that will be less apparent.Of course, having a preference for toned over bright I suspect in the hand Jaggy's has more eye appeal. But strictly grade wise, nEF (ebay) gVF (Jaggy) for me. Both nice coins. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.