Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hell All,

New to numismatism and having to learn as I go.

I'm getting the hang of grading, I think, but every now and then I get thrown a weird one.

I have a 1992-1993 Silver proof 50 p with certificate of authenticity.

The coins appears to have been weekly stuck and the lettering at the strat of Elizabeth is not fully formed (see Pic)

Is this common on silver proofs.

I kow on most coins mistakes increase value.

Any help appreciatedpost-7313-028360500 1332870084_thumb.jpg

Posted

Ironically enough, unlike currency a proof is less collectable if defective as they were never intended for circulation. For these, the closer to perfection, the greater the desirability and hence value. Mistruck proofs are decidedly rare, though you get some patterns such as the Victorian decimal series where defective flans are the norm for certain types. The number of proof and pattern collectors is considerably lower than for currency, though most will collect both. The number of proof or pattern only collectors is minimal.

Posted

Hell All,

New to numismatism and having to learn as I go.

I'm getting the hang of grading, I think, but every now and then I get thrown a weird one.

I have a 1992-1993 Silver proof 50 p with certificate of authenticity.

The coins appears to have been weekly stuck and the lettering at the strat of Elizabeth is not fully formed (see Pic)

Is this common on silver proofs.

I kow on most coins mistakes increase value.

Any help appreciatedpost-7313-028360500 1332870084_thumb.jpg

Ok, so, basically Proof is Proof, so no curve balls in there...............Spelling.................weekly stuck? Weakly struck............strat, should read start?. Sorry, just making srue :)

Posted

Hell All,

New to numismatism and having to learn as I go.

I'm getting the hang of grading, I think, but every now and then I get thrown a weird one.

I have a 1992-1993 Silver proof 50 p with certificate of authenticity.

The coins appears to have been weekly stuck and the lettering at the strat of Elizabeth is not fully formed (see Pic)

Is this common on silver proofs.

I kow on most coins mistakes increase value.

Any help appreciatedpost-7313-028360500 1332870084_thumb.jpg

Ok, so, basically Proof is Proof, so no curve balls in there...............Spelling.................weekly stuck? Weakly struck............strat, should read start?. Sorry, just making srue :)

People who live in iPhones shouldn't throw scones

Posted

Hell All,

New to numismatism and having to learn as I go.

I'm getting the hang of grading, I think, but every now and then I get thrown a weird one.

I have a 1992-1993 Silver proof 50 p with certificate of authenticity.

The coins appears to have been weekly stuck and the lettering at the strat of Elizabeth is not fully formed (see Pic)

Is this common on silver proofs.

I kow on most coins mistakes increase value.

Any help appreciatedpost-7313-028360500 1332870084_thumb.jpg

Ok, so, basically Proof is Proof, so no curve balls in there...............Spelling.................weekly stuck? Weakly struck............strat, should read start?. Sorry, just making srue :)

People who live in iPhones shouldn't throw scones

Particularly those from Snotland when discussing 50p poofs

Posted

Hell All,

New to numismatism and having to learn as I go.

I'm getting the hang of grading, I think, but every now and then I get thrown a weird one.

I have a 1992-1993 Silver proof 50 p with certificate of authenticity.

The coins appears to have been weekly stuck and the lettering at the strat of Elizabeth is not fully formed (see Pic)

Is this common on silver proofs.

I kow on most coins mistakes increase value.

Any help appreciatedpost-7313-028360500 1332870084_thumb.jpg

Ok, so, basically Proof is Proof, so no curve balls in there...............Spelling.................weekly stuck? Weakly struck............strat, should read start?. Sorry, just making srue :)

People who live in iPhones shouldn't throw scones

Particularly those from Snotland when discussing 50p poofs

Thanks for the help, even though it seems i cna't tpye verrey well :-))

Was hoping it would go with the 1845 5/3 Half crown I picked up recently.

Posted

Thanks for the help, even though it seems i cna't tpye verrey well :-))

Was hoping it would go with the 1845 5/3 Half crown I picked up recently.

Picture?

Posted

Hmmm, rather a spread in type of coin there?

I think you will find many more that would appreciate that half crown on these boards....

Posted

Hmmm, rather a spread in type of coin there?

I think you will find many more that would appreciate that half crown on these boards....

I'm a newbie collector, so still trying to decide where to specialise. Doesn't help with the BOSS (wife) collecting with me, she goes for one's she like the look of.

So far collection ranges from Roman through to the Silver 50p Proof. Personally I prefer Hammered (Post Roman) and early milled.

Have had some luck so far and managed to pick up some bargains along the way.

Picture of the 1845 5/3 posted but I haven't worked out how to get the detail, it doesn't show where you can see the remnants of the 3 under the 5, and I only paid less than the value of and straight 1845 HCpost-7313-018419900 1333052016_thumb.jpg

Posted

Hmmm, rather a spread in type of coin there?

I think you will find many more that would appreciate that half crown on these boards....

I'm a newbie collector, so still trying to decide where to specialise. Doesn't help with the BOSS (wife) collecting with me, she goes for one's she like the look of.

So far collection ranges from Roman through to the Silver 50p Proof. Personally I prefer Hammered (Post Roman) and early milled.

Have had some luck so far and managed to pick up some bargains along the way.

Picture of the 1845 5/3 posted but I haven't worked out how to get the detail, it doesn't show where you can see the remnants of the 3 under the 5, and I only paid less than the value of and straight 1845 HCpost-7313-018419900 1333052016_thumb.jpg

"Hammered" really refers to medieval coins even though striking methods hadn't changed for centuries. Post-Roman - i.e. Saxon and Viking - isn't generally referred to that way. And the series are very different - I very much like the post-Roman coinage (though I can't afford it), unlike hammered, which I don't really. The designs and styles and proportions are quite separate.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...
Test