Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi, i’m wondering if this is a known variety or just an oddball. The 1 in the date is over another clearly separated 1 and the 4 appears to be both the plain and serif version at the same time. Any insight is much appreciatedĀ šŸ™

IMG_6007.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted

Just an oddball. Letters and digits on worn/filled dies were often repaired by re-punching, and not surprisingly these were often slightly misplaced. Of little extra interest unless the wrong punch has been used or the misplacement is extreme.

As for the ā€˜4’ it may just be a die flaw.

Jerry

  • Like 1
Posted

Just to add a bitĀ more:Ā the first few years ofĀ theĀ changeover to bronze saw a helluva lot of repunching ofĀ date digitsĀ and legend letters. Bronze is a harder metalĀ than copper,Ā andĀ the coins were thinner inĀ size, soĀ dies got wornĀ relatively quickly. As well as that, the Mint is reported to have experienced a lot of problems caused by the change of metal, whichĀ the huge number of varieties (major, minor, and micro) inĀ  the first few years can attest to.Ā Ā 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Ɨ
Ɨ
  • Create New...