scottishmoney Posted May 15 Posted May 15 This was a recent pickup in a USA auction, I like the condition of the piece, it being much better than most farthings of that era - but I enjoy the additional cuds on Charles II's nose and Britannia's right arm from the die breaking down. Also it appears as though the numeral 1 in 1675 was repunched - almost appears to have been repunched over a numeral 5! 5 Quote
Rob Posted May 17 Posted May 17 It is always worth ignoring die damage on a generally heavily circulated denomination in scarce condition. A few years ago I had an A/R in CAR farthing with weak central areas that I wanted a fair, but full price for on the grounds that I had only traced mine and the Colin Cooke example. Someone I know locally refused to pay so much in the hope one would turn up. Happy to report he's still waiting......... Quote
copper123 Posted May 19 Posted May 19 Charles II farthings in that sort of condition are well sort after the halfpennies are even scarcer Quote
oldcopper Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1675 farthings are more often than not weakly struck on the hair and middle of Britannia. This year suffers more from that than the other years. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.