SilverAge3 Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago I have read through Michael Gouby's discussion of 1858 pennies. He seems to feel there are no 8 over 3. I may side with him. His reasoning seems sound. https://www.michael-coins.co.uk/cp_1858.htm I have looked at current ebay offerings of 8/3, none of them look promising as specimen. A couple examples (yes sellers make wild bs claims, nothing new) https://www.ebay.com/itm/177731430716 https://www.ebay.com/itm/336379281950 There was a graded example on Heritage, but I'm not convinced it is an 8/3, either. https://coins.ha.com/itm/great-britain/great-britain-victoria-penny-1858-3-/a/3015-24982.s Anyhow, has there been more supporting evidence come forward? Do you think there are examples, or do you agree with Michael? Quote
SilverAge3 Posted 9 hours ago Author Posted 9 hours ago Genuine 3 from 1853 (via Michael's website) Quote
SilverAge3 Posted 8 hours ago Author Posted 8 hours ago I realize the title should specify pennies. Lazy omission. If any mods are able to edit that, I would appreciate it. Quote
SilverAge3 Posted 8 hours ago Author Posted 8 hours ago (edited) I found another supposed example graded by NGC, for sale on ebay Frankly picture is too grainy to help. https://www.ebay.com/itm/137154063942 Edited 8 hours ago by SilverAge3 Quote
SilverAge3 Posted 4 hours ago Author Posted 4 hours ago (edited) Another graded example, this in PCGS slab. Possibly something under there, but I side w Michael it does not look like 1853's "3", the shape is wrong. https://ebay.us/m/veFOIB Edited 4 hours ago by SilverAge3 Quote
SilverAge3 Posted 4 hours ago Author Posted 4 hours ago Another raw claimining 1858/3 Looks similar overdate to one in PCGS, at quick glance. Die crack that PCGS one does not have. https://ebay.us/m/59lIoN (Both this and the one in PCGS have hair ribbon-like things, which I recall theories being die clashes. PCGS one even has extension to hair curl's end). Quote
jelida Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) Yes, some people continue to describe an 1858 5/3 for various nondescript overstrikes, doubling etc but it has long been suspected that a genuine 5/3 doesn’t exist. Perhaps likely candidate for Bramah 25B 5/3 is what Gouby describes as 5/? with the protrusion on the left within the lower loop of the 8. There has been suggestion that 25B is over a 2, though of course 1852 pennies were never issued and the survival of an 1852 die for six years until use is also unlikely. That doesn’t eliminate the possibility of an erroneous digit punch being used in a die repair though. Jerry Edited 2 hours ago by jelida Typo 1 Quote
jelida Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 53 minutes ago, jelida said: Yes, some people continue to describe an 1858 5/3 for various nondescript overstrikes, doubling etc but it has long been suspected that a genuine 5/3 doesn’t exist. Perhaps likely candidate for Bramah 25B 5/3 is what Gouby describes as 5/? with the protrusion on the left within the lower loop of the 8. There has been suggestion that 25B is over a 2, though of course 1852 pennies were never issued and the survival of an 1852 die for six years until use is also unlikely. That doesn’t eliminate the possibility of an erroneous digit punch being used in a die repair though. Jerry Just revisiting my 1858 5/3 or 5/2, perhaps this was Bramah 25B. Pic attached. Note the limb to the left of the top loop of the 8. Jerry Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.