Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have read through Michael Gouby's discussion of 1858 pennies.
He seems to feel there are no 8 over 3.
I may side with him. His reasoning seems sound.

https://www.michael-coins.co.uk/cp_1858.htm

 

I have looked at current ebay offerings of 8/3, none of them look promising as specimen.

A couple examples (yes sellers make wild bs claims, nothing new)

https://www.ebay.com/itm/177731430716
https://www.ebay.com/itm/336379281950

 

There was a graded example on Heritage, but I'm not convinced it is an 8/3, either.

https://coins.ha.com/itm/great-britain/great-britain-victoria-penny-1858-3-/a/3015-24982.s

 

Anyhow, has there been more supporting evidence come forward? Do you think there are examples, or do you agree with Michael?

Posted

Genuine 3 from 1853 (via Michael's website)

cp1853---3a.gif

Posted

I realize the title should specify pennies. Lazy omission. If any mods are able to edit that, I would appreciate it.

Posted (edited)

Another graded example, this in PCGS slab. Possibly something under there, but I side w Michael it does not look like 1853's "3", the shape is wrong.

 

https://ebay.us/m/veFOIB

s-l1200 (23).webp

s-l1200 (22).webp

Edited by SilverAge3
Posted

Another raw claimining 1858/3
Looks similar overdate to one in PCGS, at quick glance. Die crack that PCGS one does not have.

https://ebay.us/m/59lIoN

 

(Both this and the one in PCGS have hair ribbon-like things, which I recall theories being die clashes. PCGS one even has extension to hair curl's end).

s-l400 (3).webp

s-l1200 (24).webp

Posted (edited)

Yes, some people continue to describe an 1858 5/3 for various nondescript overstrikes, doubling etc but it has long been suspected that a genuine 5/3 doesn’t exist. Perhaps likely candidate for Bramah 25B 5/3 is what Gouby describes as 5/? with the protrusion on the left within the lower loop of the 8. There has been suggestion that 25B is over a 2, though of course 1852 pennies were never issued and the survival of an 1852 die for six years until use is also unlikely. That doesn’t eliminate the possibility of an erroneous digit punch being used in a die repair though.

Jerry

Edited by jelida
Typo
  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...
Test