Nonmortuus Posted February 2, 2019 Posted February 2, 2019 As the title. Following the discussion on Azda thread can I have your opinions on grade please on this half crown. I dont mind slabbed coins and i am thinking of submitting it. Quote
VickySilver Posted February 2, 2019 Posted February 2, 2019 Nice overall appearance, very pleasant. The field toward 5 o'clock has some friction as do the high points. I am more in the 58 camp. Quote
coinkat Posted February 2, 2019 Posted February 2, 2019 I consider the 1698 to be the most available date of the series. Your example looks well struck. My concern is over the quality of the fields and that could be just in the image and not the coin. I would not be in the MS camp- the thread captures the problems of trying to grade from an image Quote
Nonmortuus Posted February 2, 2019 Author Posted February 2, 2019 Thanks for the feedback. The fields actually look much better in hand and this was broken out of an ANACS slab before I bought it. At the time I felt that it had been undergraded as did the seller (obviously) but also the guys from Baldwin's on the next table. Quote
coinkat Posted February 3, 2019 Posted February 3, 2019 https:///coinimages/2026/04100933/05728398_large.1698.jpg?v=1549156610276 Quote
Nonmortuus Posted February 3, 2019 Author Posted February 3, 2019 What did that example grade at @coinkat? Quote
Peckris 2 Posted February 3, 2019 Posted February 3, 2019 AUnc, or GEF at the very least. Beautiful coin. (There is the usual reverse weakness probably caused by the boldness of the portrait). Quote
1949threepence Posted February 3, 2019 Posted February 3, 2019 5 hours ago, Peckris 2 said: AUnc, or GEF at the very least. Beautiful coin. (There is the usual reverse weakness probably caused by the boldness of the portrait). Exactly my thought before I saw your post. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.