Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi again.

Could anyone tell me if there are any 1841 Queen Victoria halfpenny forgeries going about? I purchased the one pictured here from ebay last week for £45. The seller had two identical 1841s on sale  last week. One on auction which sold for £41 & one on buy it now for £45. The buy it now finished 5 minutes before the auctioned one, hence i purchased it to make sure of getting it. I received the coin today and it is slightly different with two small noticeable dinks in the neck. Definitely not the coin purchased. Now what makes me suspicious is the seller now has another two 1841 halfpennies on sale again on ebay which you can look at. Again identical, again same buying format,  buy it now and auction. Sure its not possible for him to be only selling five almost identical 1841 halfpennies. 

Any advice appreciated. 

20170510_140135~2.jpg

Posted (edited)

I've never heard of any 1841 halfpenny fakes, nor indeed any non contemporary copper or bronze fakes (tooled to look like a 1933 penny, excepted). Although it wouldn't surprise me if in due course some appeared. Maybe others know differently.

What would concern me here is the fact that you got a different coin from the one shown in the buy it now pic. I'd take that up with the seller - do you have a link to the sale and a pic of the reverse of the coin you have?

Thanks.

 

Edited by 1949threepence
  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Michael-Roo said:

What's your opinion? 

I notice the seller isn't a regular coin seller. His other items are non coin related. 

I must admit, it does seem a bit odd.  

  • Like 1
Posted

Yes thats the seller Michael. Have i anything to be suspicious of? Reverse of the coin pictured here.

20170510_140149~2.jpg

Posted (edited)

The colour looks too uniform for my liking. Even with a full lustre coin you see some variation in the toning. It ought to be 175 years old, after all.

Having said that, it is the commonest date. Question is, are the marks the same on all coins?

Edited by Rob
  • Like 1
Posted

 

Like you, I think they look ok but why would someone who doesn't sell coins have ten (still ten after you've bought one?) all brilliant uncirculated, and all so brilliant uncirculated that you're not even required to select the specimen you want?

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Michael-Roo said:

 

Like you, I think they look ok but why would someone who doesn't sell coins have ten (still ten after you've bought one?) all brilliant uncirculated, and all so brilliant uncirculated that you're not even required to select the specimen you want?

 

Precisely. That is very suspicious and sets alarm bells ringing.. 

Posted

1949 threepence....now that i,ve done a double take of 10 of.....well who is going to have over 15 x 1841 halfpennies! ! I think i may ask for a refund.

Posted

Hi Rob.

Its a different stock photograph than the one he used last week.

Posted

With a buy it now price of £50 it has to be wrong. Whether you know anything about coins or not, a simple search will show things in that condition selling for a couple hundred.

Posted
18 minutes ago, declan03 said:

1949 threepence....now that i,ve done a double take of 10 of.....well who is going to have over 15 x 1841 halfpennies! ! I think i may ask for a refund.

Well you have a good excuse if you weren't sent the exact coin in the pic. 

Although, equally, it would be interesting to have it tested, just to see if it is fake. 

Posted

Looking at the previous sales, the earlier picture had a complete E in DEI, whilst the one currrently on offer has the broken E. It could be a genuine small group that he has acquired. Other bulk groups of mint state same date coins have come to light in recent years. 1825 and 1890 farthings for example, or the group of 50 1905 sixpences.

  • Like 1
Posted

If they are copies, he must surely be using someone else's pictures. A group of genuine coins might possibly contain examples of complete and broken E coins, but copies would be all from the same batch, i.e. full or broken E, but highly unlikely both. It might be worth buying a second example to compare. If genuine, £50 is a steal. If not you can get your money back.

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Rob said:

If they are copies, he must surely be using someone else's pictures. A group of genuine coins might possibly contain examples of complete and broken E coins, but copies would be all from the same batch, i.e. full or broken E, but highly unlikely both. It might be worth buying a second example to compare. If genuine, £50 is a steal. If not you can get your money back.

Fill your boots with them Rob!! He has another 11 

Posted

I heard sometime last year that a mint roll(s) of CHP1841 had been found, the finder sold them with multiple listings on Ebay, price started top end but flooded the market, in the end they were selling in bulk for less than half book price. There are several now in slabs both this side and the other side of the pond, all very high grades, similar happened with CF1825 a few years ago, too many too soon for the market to absorb and keep price buoyant.

There are CHP forgeries, dates I have seen are 1825 and 1826 modern looking contemporary copies, 1845, 1848, 1851 and 1860 there is an error with all, an exaggerated long serif to the first 1 of the date, and the identical flat worn reverse used for all.

 

  • Like 3
Posted
28 minutes ago, Chingford said:

I heard sometime last year that a mint roll(s) of CHP1841 had been found, the finder sold them with multiple listings on Ebay, price started top end but flooded the market, in the end they were selling in bulk for less than half book price. There are several now in slabs both this side and the other side of the pond, all very high grades, similar happened with CF1825 a few years ago, too many too soon for the market to absorb and keep price buoyant.

There are CHP forgeries, dates I have seen are 1825 and 1826 modern looking contemporary copies, 1845, 1848, 1851 and 1860 there is an error with all, an exaggerated long serif to the first 1 of the date, and the identical flat worn reverse used for all.

 

I must admit, if it was me who'd found such a mint roll, I'd release just a few, only very gradually. Probably still keep the majority for a rainy day.

  • Like 1
Posted
16 hours ago, Rob said:

He isn't doing authentication any more. He's looking after his grandchildren now.

Maybe he ought to consider taking his website down then, or leaving a merssage on it. 

  • Like 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, 1949threepence said:

I must admit, if it was me who'd found such a mint roll, I'd release just a few, only very gradually. Probably still keep the majority for a rainy day.

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...
Test