mrbadexample Posted February 25, 2016 Author Posted February 25, 2016 1 hour ago, IanB said: Does the use of high magnification actually prevent us from buying coins that in reality are perfectly acceptable? I think probably yes. When cataloging my farthings I lowered my opinion of the grade of quite a few of them. Have the coins changed? Nope. I never considered myself a generous grader either (although some of you on here are downright mean ) but the ability to see so much closer made me rethink. As for the penny, sorry, it's rather nice. As for the set, I'm still undecided. My initial reaction was a bit of panic, but I keep having another look. And another look. Quote
IanB Posted February 25, 2016 Posted February 25, 2016 (edited) Put them away for a day or two and then come back to them with fresh eyes. Edited February 25, 2016 by IanB Quote
Colin G. Posted February 25, 2016 Posted February 25, 2016 It really is difficult to be certain from photos, and as Ian says grading by microscope can be useful in circumstances but inevitably will be a bit harsher. If you grade all your coins by microscope you will soon be left with a very small collection Quote
mrbadexample Posted February 26, 2016 Author Posted February 26, 2016 After all that, I'm keeping it. Now, I need another wreath crown. This one's lonely. Quote
mrbadexample Posted February 26, 2016 Author Posted February 26, 2016 I can't do any better than the ebay ones Ian: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/RARE-1927-SILVER-PROOF-6-COIN-SET-CROWN-TO-THREEPENCE-IN-HARD-CASE-OF-ISSUE-/201517546371?hash=item2eeb61bb83:g:aH4AAOSwX~dWs3mu Quote
IanB Posted February 26, 2016 Posted February 26, 2016 They sure are pretty. They make my bits of bronze look like the poor relation. 1 Quote
VickySilver Posted February 28, 2016 Posted February 28, 2016 Most say 5x to 10x, erring toward the former. Quote
mrbadexample Posted March 1, 2016 Author Posted March 1, 2016 Can I ask what you think of this one: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/GEORGE-V-1930-WREATH-CROWN-VERY-RARE-/191815572478? I can't put my finger on it, but it just doesn't seem quite right. Quote
PWA 1967 Posted March 1, 2016 Posted March 1, 2016 Not my thing ,but why Jon Whats wrong with it ?. I would not really have a clue ,but looks ok to me Quote
mrbadexample Posted March 1, 2016 Author Posted March 1, 2016 I'm not really sure Pete, might be just his lighting. Texture maybe seems a bit granular? Quote
Paulus Posted March 1, 2016 Posted March 1, 2016 (edited) There's a lot of Chinese copies of these around, if you were considering it (personally I wouldn't, low on eye appeal and grade), you would certainly want to know the weight (which should be 28.3g). It wouldn't look all that majestic alongside your 1927 example (which is a bit unfair I know, your 1927 being a very high grade proof!) Edited March 1, 2016 by Paulus Quote
mrbadexample Posted March 1, 2016 Author Posted March 1, 2016 No, I wasn't thinking of buying that one, but I would like to know how to spot a fake. Quote
PWA 1967 Posted March 1, 2016 Posted March 1, 2016 I wasnt looking at it from a buying point of view. Just thought it looked OK. Quote
Paulus Posted March 1, 2016 Posted March 1, 2016 It can be difficult going by pics alone, unless you have pics of a known fake with the same post production digs, edge knocks, dings, etc Al lot of the modern Chinese ones from the likes of Ali Express are the wrong weight (being made with no silver, or the wrong silver alloy). Ali Express sell them clearly as copies but some of them are pretty good at first glance. Many I have seen are mid grade (like this one) and have a dull brown tone, but of course that is not conclusive. It's a problem. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.