Mark240590 Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 Hi, live just bought myself a 2nd dollar and I was wondering if anyone on here could help me with the grades of them I put them both into the Fine category although both coins are very different both have weak strikes and evident under type. I believe #1 could be struck on a Guatemala Dollar given the positioning of what appears to be a cud next to hispan. It's obverse 1 reverse 1. #2 is my new purchase these are seller pics but are brilliant, this is obverse 4 reverse 1 and is Carolyn's IIII under type dated 1808 which is the final issue for him. Thanks in advance for any help Quote
Mark240590 Posted January 11, 2016 Author Posted January 11, 2016 Apologies I missed the links out :S #1 It's nicer toned than this its just under intense light. #2 Quote
azda Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 I'd give the first Good Fine and the 2nd NVF to VF. The underlying type are clearly vsible on both coins although there was no Carolyn's IIII in 1808, i suspect that was a typo. Here is mine, this also has the host coin on both sides, this was grade as EF or better and prooflike by the auction house Quote
azda Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 It seems like i can only upload 500kb in any 1 thread and not in any post, so cannot add the REV sorry Quote
Mark240590 Posted January 11, 2016 Author Posted January 11, 2016 13 minutes ago, azda said: It seems like i can only upload 500kb in any 1 thread and not in any post, so cannot add the REV sorry It's a shame it's beautiful. I'll have to save and get myself something along the lines of that too which has a clearer strike thanks for the grading help, I honestly would have only had both in F then again I am always conservative. I did also mean Carolous Ha ! The last of his issues, which along with the pillar and strong undertype in general prompted me to buy it Quote
azda Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 I think having the host coin clearly visible makes These coins a bit more interesting, it's a pity they Are not more widely collected As there Are quite a few different types. Quote
Mark240590 Posted January 11, 2016 Author Posted January 11, 2016 7 minutes ago, azda said: I think having the host coin clearly visible makes These coins a bit more interesting, it's a pity they Are not more widely collected As there Are quite a few different types. I find that with a lot of coins I collect. I don't usually focus much on the coins of the U.K. To be fair, although I love them. I've always loved the colonial coinage. I never seem to find anyone who collects with the same passion as me at the moment colonially speaking in obsessed with Canadian tokens ! Quote
Mark240590 Posted January 11, 2016 Author Posted January 11, 2016 I find our trade dollars to be amazing too... Especially the chop-marked ones. So far for those all I have is 1902 chopped, 1930 london no mintmark. Missing the Calcutta Quote
Nordle11 Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 There are a couple of types of coins I would like to have an example of outside of my collecting area, and a chop-marked coin is one of them! I would love to own one, one day. Quote
jacinbox Posted January 11, 2016 Posted January 11, 2016 5 hours ago, Mark240590 said: Apologies I missed the links out :S #1 It's nicer toned than this its just under intense light. #2 1) F 2) VF Quote
Mark240590 Posted January 12, 2016 Author Posted January 12, 2016 10 hours ago, jacinbox said: 1) F 2) VF Thanks, now I have two people agreeing it makes me a little happier Quote
Rob Posted January 12, 2016 Posted January 12, 2016 I think both fall a bit short of the grades quoted, though not by too much. The reverse of the second is better than the obverse. Quote
Paulus Posted January 12, 2016 Posted January 12, 2016 I would say aF for the first and GF (Obv) nVF (Rev) for the 2nd Quote
Paulus Posted January 12, 2016 Posted January 12, 2016 This is mine, I would like a better grade with the host coin showing through more Quote
Mark240590 Posted January 12, 2016 Author Posted January 12, 2016 3 hours ago, Rob said: I think both fall a bit short of the grades quoted, though not by too much. The reverse of the second is better than the obverse. Un-doubtably yes, I am quite happy with my own grading usually and any other coin would be fine but with these being overstruck I like a second opinion. More so for #2 because I wouldn't have said it would grade much higher than 1 as I beileve the obverse of 1 has a better look too it than that of 2, although I think some of that can be attributed to a weakness in the strike. The reverse particularly the crown is a lot bolder but the legend is poor. i think given the afore mentioned, it's likely in the future I will sell or swap #1 and buy a gVF or EF With nice clear strikes. Quote
azda Posted January 12, 2016 Posted January 12, 2016 (edited) Personally i would keep both due to the host coins being visible, they are of a Great time in British history when the Navy was kicking Spanish ass. Surprisingly enough a Proof BoE went through Heritage Last week unsold, $1500 Here is the REV of mine from above. The undertype can be seen through the legend in BANK Edited January 12, 2016 by azda Quote
Mark240590 Posted January 12, 2016 Author Posted January 12, 2016 2 hours ago, azda said: Personally i would keep both due to the host coins being visible, they are of a Great time in British history when the Navy was kicking Spanish ass. Surprisingly enough a Proof BoE went through Heritage Last week unsold, $1500 Here is the REV of mine from above. The undertype can be seen through the legend in BANK That's a really awesome piece mate ! i didn't see the proof, they're cool though. Proofs have a polished edge Quote
azda Posted January 12, 2016 Posted January 12, 2016 Described as follows George III copper Proof Bank of England Dollar of 5 Shillings 1804 PR66 Brown NGC, KM-Tn1a, ESC-1935 (old ESC-152), thick flan. On obverse, stop after REX, leaf to center; on reverse "K" in relief. Even chocolate brown color, with fully mirrored fields. The finest certified example of this type. Quote
Paulus Posted January 12, 2016 Posted January 12, 2016 Very nice, was there still a 'host coin' for these, or is that a stupid question? Quote
azda Posted January 12, 2016 Posted January 12, 2016 Not unless Spanish 8 reales came in copper Quote
Mark240590 Posted January 12, 2016 Author Posted January 12, 2016 That's awesome, all the proofs were struck on plain planchets Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.