Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,  

live just bought myself a 2nd dollar and I was wondering if anyone on here could help me with the grades of them I put them both into the Fine category although both coins are very different both have weak strikes and evident under type. I believe #1 could be struck on a Guatemala Dollar given the positioning of what appears to be a cud next to hispan. It's obverse 1 reverse 1.

 

 

#2 is my new purchase these are seller pics but are brilliant, this is obverse 4 reverse 1 and is Carolyn's IIII under type dated 1808 which is the final issue for him.

 

Thanks in advance for any help :)

Posted

Apologies I missed the links out :S

 

#1

It's nicer toned than this its just under intense light.

87EACAA7-DD77-4760-86A1-C27DE71CB298.jpg

27FB89D9-B6AF-45B1-AD43-D942DA229D21.jpg

#2 

0E6FEA06-6E37-4E8E-9215-FBB8189CFCFA.png

4CC5FF67-597B-4D5E-B913-6DEA856D7E88.png

 

Posted

I'd give the first Good Fine and the 2nd NVF to VF. The underlying type are clearly vsible on both coins although there was no Carolyn's IIII in 1808, i suspect that was a typo. Here is mine, this also has the host coin on both sides, this was grade as EF or better and prooflike by the auction house

PA011820.JPG

Posted

It seems like i can only upload 500kb in any 1 thread and not in any post, so cannot add the REV sorry

Posted
13 minutes ago, azda said:

It seems like i can only upload 500kb in any 1 thread and not in any post, so cannot add the REV sorry

It's a shame it's beautiful. I'll have to save and get myself something along the lines of that too which has a clearer strike :) 

thanks for the grading help, I honestly would have only had both in F then again I am always conservative. I did also mean Carolous Ha ! The last of his issues, which along with the pillar and strong undertype in general prompted me to buy it :)

Posted

I think having the host coin clearly visible makes These coins a bit more interesting, it's a pity they Are not more widely collected As there Are quite a few different types.

Posted
7 minutes ago, azda said:

I think having the host coin clearly visible makes These coins a bit more interesting, it's a pity they Are not more widely collected As there Are quite a few different types.

I find that with a lot of coins I collect. I don't usually focus much on the coins of the U.K. To be fair, although I love them. I've always loved the colonial coinage. I never seem to find anyone who collects with the same passion as me :) at the moment colonially speaking in obsessed with Canadian tokens ! 

Posted

I find our trade dollars to be amazing too... Especially the chop-marked ones. So far for those all I have is 1902 chopped, 1930 london no mintmark. Missing the Calcutta :(

Posted

There are a couple of types of coins I would like to have an example of outside of my collecting area, and a chop-marked coin is one of them! I would love to own one, one day.

Posted
5 hours ago, Mark240590 said:

Apologies I missed the links out :S

 

#1

It's nicer toned than this its just under intense light.

87EACAA7-DD77-4760-86A1-C27DE71CB298.jpg

27FB89D9-B6AF-45B1-AD43-D942DA229D21.jpg

#2 

0E6FEA06-6E37-4E8E-9215-FBB8189CFCFA.png

4CC5FF67-597B-4D5E-B913-6DEA856D7E88.png

 

1) F

2) VF

Posted
10 hours ago, jacinbox said:

1) F

2) VF

Thanks, now I have two people agreeing it makes me a little happier :D 

Posted
3 hours ago, Rob said:

I think both fall a bit short of the grades quoted, though not by too much. The reverse of the second is better than the obverse.

Un-doubtably yes, I am quite happy with my own grading usually and any other coin would be fine but with these being overstruck I like a second opinion. More so for #2 because I wouldn't have said it would grade much higher than 1 as I beileve the obverse of 1 has a better look too it than that of 2, although I think some of that can be attributed to a weakness in the strike. The reverse particularly the crown is a lot bolder but the legend is poor.

 

i think given the afore mentioned, it's likely in the future I will sell or swap #1 and buy a gVF or EF With nice clear strikes. :) 

Posted (edited)

Personally i would keep both due to the host coins being visible, they are of a Great time in British history when the Navy was kicking Spanish ass.

Surprisingly enough a Proof BoE went through Heritage Last week unsold, $1500 Here is the REV of mine from above. The undertype can be seen through the legend in BANK

 

PA011821.jpg

Edited by azda
Posted
2 hours ago, azda said:

Personally i would keep both due to the host coins being visible, they are of a Great time in British history when the Navy was kicking Spanish ass.

Surprisingly enough a Proof BoE went through Heritage Last week unsold, $1500 Here is the REV of mine from above. The undertype can be seen through the legend in BANK

 

PA011821.jpg

That's a really awesome piece mate !

i didn't see the proof, they're cool though. Proofs have a polished edge :) 

Posted

Described as follows

 

George III copper Proof Bank of England Dollar of 5 Shillings 1804 PR66 Brown NGC, KM-Tn1a, ESC-1935 (old ESC-152), thick flan. On obverse, stop after REX, leaf to center; on reverse "K" in relief. Even chocolate brown color, with fully mirrored fields. The finest certified example of this type.
 

image.jpeg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...
Test