Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Nordle11

Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,852

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    66

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Nordle11

  1. Nordle11
    Cheers Jac, pictures in about an hour or so
  2. Nordle11
    No you're OK, I think it is a site access thing because I know that Brian (bhx7) has the same problem with not being able to edit. I'd ask Tom to edit it as Pete says, then ask him to give you access too
  3. Nordle11
    Try this for size. 1. Click edit here in the thread 2. then click full editor 3. then delete the attachments
  4. Nordle11
    First click edit and you'll see the first picture I've attached underneath the textbox. Then click the use full editor button and you can then delete your attachments (2nd pic)
  5. Nordle11
    It's just the button that takes you to the screen you get that allows you to upload pictures as an attachment. One sec I'll screenshot it
  6. Nordle11
    How ? Edit the post, look to the right of the attachment and there is a 'delete' button. Then just upload another. EDIT: You need 'use full editor' to do it.
  7. Nordle11
    I like how it was too late until you realised you no longer live there
  8. Nordle11
    Ah, no harm no foul
  9. Nordle11
    You should block out your name and adress on there Richard, I wouldn't trust the internet with it Great provenance for the coin though, thanks for sharing.
  10. Nordle11
    Indeed a little disappointed, but there maybe suerte yet! I'll get some microscpe pics when I get home tonight, but playing around with some overlaps right now, the mark you're referring to certainly fits the bill..
  11. Nordle11
    Arrived today, still not sure though I'll get better pictures later but it's in a flip now and my phone doesn't do close shots very well. Now I'm starting to believe that it's a 1963 with a die number 2 because of the positioning of the 3 and the spacing between it and the 6. Comparison shots here too. 1 - My coin 2 - Normal 3 3 - Open 3 4 - Die number 2 (Possibly this one) 5 - Die number 3 6 - Die number 4
  12. Nordle11
    Agreed. Seconded. Also if you need to add drawings to show the variety then it can't be all that exciting to have to find either.
  13. Nordle11
    Some close up pictures. It's still difficult to tell if the 9 is open or not, it looks like it took a whack at some point. Even without knowing if the 9 is open or not, it doesn't fit into the first 5 varieties due to the 4 not being slanted and being lower in the exergue.
  14. Nordle11
    Definitely NOT a gap filler Danz, that's a cracking coin! Love the chocolaty tone on it
  15. Nordle11
    Yes that's much better, I get 184 too. Here it is in tens, as suggested (different colour for each group of 10)
  16. Nordle11
    When counting I usually print it out A4 size and go around with a marker counting every 10, you don't lose count that way. Sounds like a great way to do it, it's nicer to have a pen and paper too. Do you have to find high res pictures to do that so the quality isn't lost when it's blown-up tp A4 size?
  17. Nordle11
    Yeah, histro-contrast up to 100%, brightness up a bit then zoomed in like a madman. The teeth to the border aren't so easy to spot, but the tips of the teeth are a little bit easier.
  18. Nordle11
    Hi Mr. T, there are 186 denticles on the reverse.
  19. Nordle11
    Add them to the useful links thread!
  20. Nordle11
    Cheers I couldn't find it for the life of me!
  21. Nordle11
    No idea then, have a quick search but "1897 dot" doesn't bring up anything!
  22. Nordle11
    Along with the strange die pairing and the not completely blank space below the date, it certainly beckons being scrutinised.
  23. Nordle11
    I didn't know there were varieties of the 1897 flaw, you're not thinking of the 1946 round dot and diamond dot we were talking about the other week? I can't find the thread through searches anyway but it's a little difficult on here.
  24. Nordle11
    This one was sold last year as a 'no h' and has good detail, however was on the 12+N pairing. It also went for £1500 so you'd hope the bidder knew what they were doing..
  25. Nordle11
    Or that it began as a very small chip and wore away progressively, so this was one of the first struck with this flaw and with each subsequent strike the dot became more prominent. Much better, and looks good to me!
×
×
  • Create New...
Test