First Die-match for the counterfeit! I noticed one major thing that stands out is the broken lion punch on the reverse shield (It looks like the Spink's 2012 plate coin also has the broken lion punch, but is a different die [that would've been a noteworthy discovery, to say the least ]), which is missing one of its rear legs, so I started looking around for the broken lions and found my first match. The obverse images below are (apologies, I overdid the resize): Top - Counterfeit coin with 15 key markers (I could've done more, but I don't think it would've made the case any stronger). Middle - Recently discovered die-match, with the same 15 markers. Bottom - The two images overlaid with transparency. I've also added the two reverses for comparison. I haven't 'tested' them together, but I'm thinking they will fit together rather nicely. So, believing the die-match coin to be a genuine example - and it certainly looks a million dollars more so than the counterfeit - what's going on? I'm presuming a counterfeit set of dies were produced from an original coin, and superbly convincing pewter/tin copies were produced en mass! ANY THOUGHTS either way, please!!!!!! BEWARE THE LEGLESS LION! I'm going to see how many groat dies I can find out there (anyone for a speculatory guess, given her short reign, and imminent marriage to Philip?), and set it up in the same fashion as the Liz dies, making a special feature of the obverse and reverse die to watch out for! I also forgot to mention that an obvious stand-out obverse detail is seen at the central cross (not the top cross) in the crown, which has the crisp infill between the branches. If anyone knows the name of that particular cross and/or the name for the individual 'triangle-branches' of it, I'd very much appreciate that information too.