1949threepence

He'd probably argue that's what he meant, if confronted, Bob. If it was just that coin, I'm sure we'd give him the benefit of the doubt.

They mostly seem to be one full grade above what they should be.

Well he is technically correct. It is R8. But it's nowhere near aEF. No more than fine in my book. He's also neglected to mention that it's a F22 (4 + D) Started off at 99p - if he'd got the grade right that would be fair enough.

Or if the "make offer" facility was available.

Very interesting. Thanks.

Nobody ever did answer this question. Does anybody happen to know? Thanks in advance.

Thing is, if I saw some dream item, I'd pay the extra. But if it was something that I would quite like, but not that bothered about, the 29% overall addition would probably put me off.

LCA do make technical errors. If you look at their 1908 pennies, there are no less than three 166's misattributed as 165's, and a 165, wrongly ID'd as a 164.

To be honest, we won't need any more new 1 or 2p's for quite a few years to come. I also think the decline in the use of cash, will plateau out quite soon. Can't ever see it being completely abandoned. After all how else could we get cut price jobs for 'cash'? I really don't like the thought of cash disappearing. I don't think people appreciate the impact it will have on our freedoms.

The sort of e bay finds you dream about Terry, and which only turn up very, very occasionally.

Thanks Richard. To be honest, I've never really bothered with cropping, so consequently never mastered the art. I'll have to look into it, see how it works.

I've managed to get a 164A - nice specimen. Although the 164A's are showing up in increasing numbers now, it's quite noticeable that they are nearly all sub fine. This one is about GF/NVF and issue free. Similar grade to Jon's earlier this year, but obviously not a patch on the one Terry posted about the end of 2017. That was superb.

Blake, just make whatever bid you want using this e mail address - info@londoncoins.co.uk - giving all your details: name, address, e mail address. Describe the coin and supply the lot No. That's what I did on my first bid with LCA. I was automatically given a bidder number at that point (well either immediately, or when I'd won the coin). Or when you've made your bid, call LCA and speak to Semra Cetin. Ask for acknowledgement, and how you get your bidder number.

No it's not you. They've omitted to take pics of a good number, which is disappointing. Won't bid on something I can't see.

I agree Jerry, that one is far from convincing. Thanks Ian, that's interesting. It was Jack Relph who sold a number of other pennies on e bay back in June. I think I can say fairly conclusively that the F39A at least, was sold at the DNW auction, as it was a job lot of 1862 pennies (lot 981). Definitely the same coin as the one identified then. Not sure about the rest - with the exception of the F38 which I bought from him. That too was among that job lot of 1862's. Obviously, he could have combined coins from different sources. This is the e bay message I received from Jack at the time:-

Incidentally, I think the F39A at lot No 1981, is the same one as shown in this post from a month or two back (note the EK at 12 o'clock) . I reckon it was amongst those bought at DNW, most probably by Jack Relph of Coopers Coins. Quite plausibly the "remnants" (for want of a better word) of the Hiram Brown collection. Although the word remnants fails to do them justice.

...and for the penny enthusiast, easily the best and most interesting listings for some considerable time... link here

Sorry, should have quoted you so you get an alert. See my post above.

Take a look at lot No 1994 in the September 2019, LCA. Might be just up your street.

Some great buys there, Jerry, especially the 169 which is obviously an absolute sod to get. £500 was a bargain price.

The best 1921 I've seen was posted by @zookeeperz in May 2018. Although it is Obverse 3 (F191). Fully struck up both sides, with outstanding hair detail, it's probably one of the best, if not the best, you'll ever see. link to it

A bit later than I'd imagined. Thanks Chris.

Thanks gents.

I must admit I thought it was already 24%. What was it?

Funnily enough Bob, I was thinking of the situation in 1868 and 1869 when I posted.