Rob

It's the only one you'll find. £15K+ is not too much and no different to the prices paid for gold halfpennies. I thought you would go for it.

Photos? You can include the bags too. I don't want to see your truncheon. Alternatively you may start a members' wives/baggage thread.

Both correct, but "climate change" is a better term to use - a rise in planetary temperature does not mean everywhere gets warmer More energy in the atmosphere leads to a more dynamic system - basically the world is likely to get more interesting weather Sounds great David. Something to break up the clouds and rain for you and me both.

Yes. On the one that I had you could see the filled curve at the top of the two and a trace of the filled bottom bar

The problem for politicians of all countries is that giving the voter a choice is dangerous, because it may interfere with, or worse still ruin their vested interests. Democracy is a double edged sword, hence the reluctance to offer it. What is passed on one occasion may not be in everyone's best interests down the line. A periodic review is therefore in everyone's interest, whichever side of the fence you are on.

looks a bit better than your typical AU58.

I've never seen a gEF AU58 even though they are supposed to be interchangeable. gVF to EF is about as good as they come. The problem stems from the fact that MS60 is never mint state unless you have a problem with your eyesight.

1998 Krause prices for a 1903 HC were $22.50, 75, 300 & 850. Don't know what the £/$ rate was though.

You will have to put up both sides. W3 shillings are the most diverse with 6 mints operating during the recoinage of 1696 and many varieties, so to give you the info you need we need both sides. You could also do with getting yourself an old copy of Spink Coins of England on eBay as this will help to id your coins. It's the only useful one when it comes to coins for the last 2000 years and you should be able to get one for a couple pounds. You don't need the latest edition.

Firstly, what exactly does it do that Windows doesn't and is it easy to use? Is it compatible with all computers? Do you have to remove microsoft's paint program first or does it do it automatically to avoid having two programs with the same name? If it comes with full instructions, presumably this info will be written down? I don't want to b****r up my computer and have to spend money getting it repaired if one of the kids isn't around. Better to retain a working system and not have it than wreck what I've got. Thanks.

Those you mention are all image formats, so the Windows default picture viewer (or MS Paint) would cover most of those. If not, a free download such as Paint.NET will do the trick. thanks

So what do you use to open png, tif, gif and bmp files? I can't remember what Baldwins used (png?).

I'm not that desperate. There is life outside of coins and eBay................ quite a lot, in fact. Rest assured that if something ticked an important box I would not miss it. It's really more about things that I can see a profit in.

I'm my own worst enemy. Missed a couple dozen bids so far over the holiday period because the reminder comes in 6 or 7 hours before it ends, meaning I've forgotten all about it by the time it is due. A few bargains missed for certain, but, c'est la vie.

.rar is a file type rather like a .zip archive - it holds compressed versions of files which then have to be uncompressed. If you're using Windows, I thought that .rar files were recognised? On my Mac I long ago downloaded a free utility (UnrarX) which uncompresses them. Maybe there is a Windows version too? Would there be any chance of having these various file extensions on a sticky (in useful references) that people can add to together with a solution to opening the files? Someone sent me an image with a psd(?) extension a while back, but neither I nor the windows program on my computer recognised it, so the image had to be binned. It wasn't the first unopenable file received as Baldwins also format their files in some unintelligible way. Obviously the problem is proprietary software, but nobody is going to buy every available program just to view an image which may not appear. Something along the lines of Adobe reader which allows you to read only would be useful.

Talking of bisons reminds me of the time a guy went fishing and caught a whale. No good though, no frame with it.

Another word of wisdom. Nobody is useless - They can always be used as a bad example.

Courtesy of my youngest. Proof that light travels faster than sound - Some people appear bright until they open their mouth.

You can pick them up quite cheaply in decent condition. It's very rare that examples sell for over £100 (Tim Everson's collection being the exception where the combination of the person who wrote the book coupled with some decent provenances pushed a few pieces very high), with VF to gVF examples appearing for tens of pounds. Like Peter, I would subscribe to the idea that although £2 for 4 is only the cost of a pint, for the cost of a round you could get something that you would want to keep long term.

Happy New Year everybody.

Silver isn't that dense. It's only 15% denser than copper and about same amount less dense than lead. Gold is a different matter being 80%+ denser than silver. Far more likely is copper or bronze with a silver dip.

Looks like he is a regular at the above establishment.

Part of the problem is that they are continually trying to portray a known figure, whose looks are already well known. If you are introducing something completely new there is no fixed image with which to compare. Comparing the above for example might lead you to say the 1999 sower was different, but acceptable/not based on individual artistic taste. Comparing with the original leaves the second one with a handicap. What would be more interesting would be a modern competent artistic rendition of a Picasso. i.e put on canvas what Picasso couldn't(?).

I agree Dave, trouble is they would f*ck it up! Look what the French have done to Roty's beautiful Sower It's a bit like replacing artistic competence with a join the dots book.

We're never going to agree on this. It's just a shame - to me - that the wider British public seems to have had its natural insularity reinforced over the decades by outsiders such as the egregious Rupert who promote xenophobia. For once, he is not the main culprit in my eyes. The seeds of anti-European rhetoric were sown long before he became the owner of the gutter press. It goes back to the decision to join the Common Market, which in a short time morphed into the European Union. That is not what people signed up to. At the moment we have a group of politicians that are self serving. The vast bulk of European citizens are nationals, not Europeans. The system cannot work until someone from Paris or Rome or wherever stands up and says that people elsewhere are being severely disadvantaged to the benefit of their home town/area/country(which should have been abolished by this point). It could even be argued that the same people in the best areas of the EU should be proactive in simultaneously lowering their own conditions whilst raising others'. It ain't going to work because nobody wants it.