Chris Perkins

Blimey, that woman in your signature Master JMD is probably getting far more pleasure than she really should out of her coin collection! http://www.crecon.com/banners/users/108352...21081finish.gif

Looks good, but the reason the text appears dull and blurry is because you saved it as a fairly low quality jpg, and to save file size space the jpg format kind of mingles the colours together.

Well you need to create an HTML link to that picture. For example: <p align="center"><img border="0" src="http://www.predecimal.com/images2/images/arrow.gif" align="left"> But replace the path: http://www.predecimal.com/images2/images/arrow.gif with the path of your image that is hosted wherever.

When you've done the HTML editing bit, copy the HTML code as text, then paste it into the signature area. The image size sounds fine.

Use an HTML editor and copy the finished text. I have never tried it, but William seems to have images. You have to make sure it's a jpg or gif and not too large. How big is the image?

Louise, To aid your research you can purchase one of these books for only £4.50 plus £2.00 postage: http://www.predecimal.com/books/ccgb2004framed.htm Register in the forum to share your findings and I'll let you have one for just £5.75 including the postage.

I have 2 in the current newsletter William, including another of the 43/34 variety!

Louise, It's a 'Three halfpence' (or one and a half pence). It was made for use in the colonies, but because it is just like larger GB denominations it's often included as a 'British' coin. Values are just a few pounds in F-VF condition.

I have a feeling some of them went into cases officially, I know the 1983 Pound coin did and the 1953 Crown did. I'm pretty sure the 1981 Charles and Di Crown, 1977 Silver Jubilee Crown and 1980 Queen mother Crown went into plastic cases at the mint..... Although I could be wrong, they could be un-official bank issued cases, but there are alot of them around, which would support the official theory.

The reason you are at the top with 'seadart' Bob is because you have probably the only website in the world that uses those 2 words together, or at least uses them together the most. The search engine bots need just follow a link form another site, and there you are, at the top. Being top with 'seadart' is all very well, but how many people around the world actually search for that phrase?? :s Geting to the top with a more common well used phrase like 'British coins' was a little harder, but with the right research and experimentation, not impossible.

I'm not editing all that! Master JMD, can you just post a link to your source?

I think online auctions, especially ebay are major players with large volumes of lower priced (and some higher) coins offered, and I also don't believe they are taken into account when many of the catalogues are compiled. I shouldn't think there would be an automated accurate way of doing it. Any market prices can only be arrived at be educated research. In the end, it's just down to who's educated research you take as gospel. Like most people I think it's best to make your own comparisons and use your own experience to arrive at accurate values.

(Well handled Oli, although you'd be lucky to get £2.00 for one. I sell them for £1 each)

No it doesn't, I don't believe they made cases for them back then, as they were probably intended to be spent. I could be wrong. No one actually knows when Maundy stopped being a thing for the poor, and became an annual thing for the pomp.

The Guinea is. Rest of the gold are commision sales for a gentleman in Barnet.

I'm afraid i didn't get a chance to renew my latest ad with: 'I have £100 to spend on coins this week' Or some such Coincraft spoof, but it's still top priority for the next one. I think there really needs to be less hard sell and stufiness in coin dealing. We need a little lightheartedness, humour and pehraps a little Rock 'n' Roll at the same time. I wonder if the Darkness would endorse me as their coin dealer of choice!! I can picture it now, an image of glam and spandex, with 'I want to spend £100 on coins this week'. 'Predecimal.com, coin dealer to 'The Darkness'! That sounds pretty funny, but I have certainly learn't that most coin collectors are not into trendy music, and that many coin collectors are young, so perhaps that would be a big market to tap into with 'Rock 'n' Roll Coin dealing'

There I am at the top of the list. It took a lot of effort to get there, hopefully I'll stay there for some time.

He's a well known dealer, used to work for Spink i think, and has published books. Search on Google, I believe he has a fledgling web site.

Mark Rasmussen had the 1952 Penny didn't he? But he was auctioning it, so he probably has it no longer.

No, the book covers everything, Celtic to Now. You're probably thinking of the equally well put together 'Collectors Coins Great Britain 2004; I've got a fine 1791 Guinea, is that up your street?

DAS, Sorry, I think I may have acidentally removed your membership during a period of housekeeping a while ago If you re register as DAS I'll bump your no. of posts up. There are some quite big differences between price guides aren't there. They all claim to get their results from dealers lists, auction results, market feel, independant experts etc. For my coins I rarely charge the full Spink prices (except for very rare of choice sought after coins). From what I have heard, many regard the 'British Coin Market Values 2004' as showing more or less the most accurate prices in most instances, but of course others say differently.

You really need a good book or 2, Master JMD.

William, the jury was out on the 1902, I think it was a Maundy one, if it's the one I think! Master JMD, you've probably got a normal 1914 Threepence. Maundy ones are usually very high grade (because they were never spend) and look prooflike, often toned darkly from being in their cases.

Hopefully the next newsletter will go out this weekend, or at least part of it, as I have a lot to do still. Maybe during the week depending how the scanning goes. You are on the mailing list already are you?

The case is not original, they were never supplied in those, I would expect that is from the 60's. 1943 and 1944 are hard years to get in respectable grades. I hope you like it when you get it.