it might be easier to set it free from its plastic tomb and take a picture , the poor thing just might be suffering from plastic entombment syndrome . Most of us set our canaries free , but I suppose when there is a question of its "label" you could always sell it to an American who will accept with reverence anything written on a label.
I'm not inclined to add it to the "Dot" pennies because virtually all of these have perfectly circular raised dots about which Paul Holland has offered a plausible explanation for their origin and I'd prefer to keep them together as a single "phenomenon".
Possibly another page could be created for coins with extraneous extra metal such as this ? Let me think about it.
Richard
I seem to recall as this coin came up for auction and looked at it. With all due respect rejected it sadly as a specimen or proof. As I have said, and have had both of the 1924 satin specimen halfpennies had some interest in it. But not to be a killjoy and hope you enjoy this one...
I have presented the specimens of this penny to M Goulby and he agrees that it should be considered as an interesting example of another "dot type" I think there may be about 7 examples now.
At the time of buying the coin, Barker, of Hull, said he was “over the moon” when he discovered how unique it was.
So, how unique is it ? Rather unique ? Quite unique ? Very unique ? A trifle unique ?
I'm afraid that the word "unique" is going the way of "literally" and "amazing" - i.e. becoming meaningless.