Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

kuhli

Ebay's Worst Offerings

Recommended Posts

Description robbed from LCA but not sure about the pictures. But definitely a bargain as worth £1600+ and up for just £350.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Uncirculated-1862-very-rare-Victoria-farthing-penny/202201957087?hash=item2f142d02df:g:kYQAAOSw57xaaLuW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, mrbadexample said:

Description robbed from LCA but not sure about the pictures. But definitely a bargain as worth £1600+ and up for just £350.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Uncirculated-1862-very-rare-Victoria-farthing-penny/202201957087?hash=item2f142d02df:g:kYQAAOSw57xaaLuW

And illustrated using a halfpenny............................ So maybe you get a farthing, halfpenny and a penny. :)

Great. Kills three birds with one stone.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

His title wasn't robbed from anywhere. ..Farthing penny??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, declan03 said:

His title wasn't robbed from anywhere. ..Farthing penny??

I said description, not title:  Uncirculated 1862 Victoria farthing penny in amazing condition very old and rare coin Penny 1862 Small Date from Halfpenny die Freeman 41dies 6+G, Fine and superior to most examples seen of this type, Very rare with all major details very clear, the finest we have handled, and possibly one of the finest knownexamples

http://londoncoins.co.uk/?page=Pastresults&searchterm=1862+Halfpenny&searchtype=1

Lot 2981, the penny. :rolleyes:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Rob said:

And illustrated using a halfpenny............................ So maybe you get a farthing, halfpenny and a penny. :)

Great. Kills three birds with one stone.

I think the odds of receiving the pictured coin are about the same as receiving a penny farthing bicycle. :)

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, mrbadexample said:

I said description, not title:  Uncirculated 1862 Victoria farthing penny in amazing condition very old and rare coin Penny 1862 Small Date from Halfpenny die Freeman 41dies 6+G, Fine and superior to most examples seen of this type, Very rare with all major details very clear, the finest we have handled, and possibly one of the finest knownexamples

http://londoncoins.co.uk/?page=Pastresults&searchterm=1862+Halfpenny&searchtype=1

Lot 2981, the penny. :rolleyes:

Why such a description and mucking up the title !!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Rob as always your advice is appreciated. 

There just seemed to me that there were a lot of scratches on the obverse compared to the reverse. Also, both parts of the reins go across the horses neck, is that unusual?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, declan03 said:

I don't think it is necessarily polished - but it is very badly photographed, and therefore I would avoid it if going from the picture is your criterion. 1889 is by far the easiest JH crown to find, even in top grade, so I'd advise holding your horses.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, declan03 said:

Cheers Rob as always your advice is appreciated. 

There just seemed to me that there were a lot of scratches on the obverse compared to the reverse. Also, both parts of the reins go across the horses neck, is that unusual?

I think that's just a combination of a crap picture and reflection. The marks just indicate which side took more hits.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol@ hold your horses 🐴🐴 . Wasn't really wanting the coin. Just looked a bitty odd. As you say, quite possibly the bad pictures. This thread has made me paranoid! Thanks for the info. 🍺🍺

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It certainly looks "ok" (I wouldn't peronally want it though) - I've been looking at 1887 crowns for months aiming for the right one (bidding for a bragain of good quality), and the think I'd say most about these is that if you can see both sides of the chest straps you're probably as close to mint as you can get - in this one only 1 side is visible.

In a world where everyone has a camera on their phones, I find it impossible people are unable to photograph coins for ebay without getting them blurry (or take that as they're blurry because the item for sale is crap).

 

As for some clarity on what isn't a good one ...

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1887-CROWN-VICTORIA/183034951765?hash=item2a9dbbb855:g:WBAAAOSwXOVaaGsq

 

This is so bad I laughed!

Edited by Unwilling Numismatist
Clarity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks polished to me.  Especially noticeable in the obverse fields and on the bust.  You can see the original unbuffed surface in the periphery where the lettering has protected it against damage.

Edited by Nick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Nick said:

Looks polished to me.  Especially noticeable in the obverse fields and on the bust.  You can see the original unbuffed surface in the periphery where the lettering has protected it against damage.

Yes, that's the clincher to tell the difference between mirror finish and polished - if it doesn't gleam between the letters, it's almost certainly been polished. And is that polish still within the loop of the 9 ? :o

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"it had a very faint but rather dull patina, that did the coin,no justice at all,so I reluctantly took the decision to,give it a light polish,it turned out to be the right decision,as it has great eye appeal,and that ,will be enhanced even more in a few years time"

I hate to think what he would call heavy polishing. 

s-l1600 - Copy.jpg

 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1849-Godless-Florin-superb-coin-great-eye-appeal/263463383277?hash=item3d57a430ed:g:qZ4AAOSwl2haGBGG

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 25/01/2018 at 0:44 PM, Unwilling Numismatist said:

It certainly looks "ok" (I wouldn't peronally want it though) - I've been looking at 1887 crowns for months aiming for the right one (bidding for a bragain of good quality), and the think I'd say most about these is that if you can see both sides of the chest straps you're probably as close to mint as you can get - in this one only 1 side is visible.

In a world where everyone has a camera on their phones, I find it impossible people are unable to photograph coins for ebay without getting them blurry (or take that as they're blurry because the item for sale is crap).

 

As for some clarity on what isn't a good one ...

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1887-CROWN-VICTORIA/183034951765?hash=item2a9dbbb855:g:WBAAAOSwXOVaaGsq

 

This is so bad I laughed!

Ohhhh....chest straps on St.George!!!!!

And there was me thinking you meant Victoria.....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes its fake John.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ozjohn said:

Coming from Hong Kong on a buy it now for £4.50. Whilst it doesn't say copy, it clearly is, and there's no intention to deceive in my view because they aren't trying to milk the market with an auction. If you are looking for inconsistencies, there is no die number that I can see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ozjohn said:

Very suspect.  The pictures show two different coins, neither of which has a die number when they should.  The queen's dress is usually weakly defined, but these are not.  Looks like 1877 florin can be added to the list of fakes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×