rpeddie Posted May 27, 2014 Posted May 27, 2014 Not sure this is to go in this section but ill give it a bash.Just wondering if anyone has any knowledge of historical Exchange rates going back say 100-300 years and how it was worked back when currencies were all based on silver/gold standards?What i have found so far seems far from intuitive where for the dollar for instance, what i would have expected is the same weight of silver for the same weight of silver back then,which in a perfect world being say $1 for 5 shillings (going by that they were both roughly an ounce of silver each,give or take silver content of american dollar i think was 0.900)Just wondering if there are any good explanations for this or carry over logic when looking at other countries silver/gold coins and how they would have stacked up with each other back in the day Quote
azda Posted May 27, 2014 Posted May 27, 2014 (edited) Was just looking through your website Mr Peddie, can i just point you towards the CGS table as you have a CGS 78 on your website and have said its ABU, but that grading term does'nt start until at least a CGS 85 grade100 FDC MS7099 FDC MS7098 FDC MS7097 FDC MS7096 FDC M6995 FDC MS 68 -6994 AFDC MS6893 AFDC MS 67 -6892 AFDC MS6791 AFDC MS66 -6790 NFDC MS 6688 BU -NFDC MS65 -6685 Choice UNC - BU MS 6582 Choice UNC MS 64 -6580 Choice UNC MS 6478 UNC MS 63 -6475 UNC or near so MS 62 - 6370 AU MS60 -6165 GEF MS60 -6160 EF AU58 - MS6055 NEF AU5550 GVF AU5545 GVF AU 5340 VF AU 5035 NVF EF 4530 GF EF 4025 GF F3520 F F3015 NF 10 VG 8 VG 5 GOOD 4 FAIR 3 FAIR 2 FAIR 1 FAIR Edited May 27, 2014 by azda Quote
rpeddie Posted May 27, 2014 Author Posted May 27, 2014 thanks for the info ill update it when i first get a chance Quote
azda Posted May 27, 2014 Posted May 27, 2014 There's also very few prices avaliable. I think I saw 1 price for a 1902 Crown at £450? Did'nt see anymore Quote
TomGoodheart Posted May 27, 2014 Posted May 27, 2014 (edited) No detailed knowledge I'm afraid. Though I do know that in the Tudor period laws were passed that gave the exchange rates for various European (and Scottish) currencies against ours. Presumably based on the fineness of silver. I also seem to remember that in the days of Edward I foreign merchants brought debased silver coin ('esterlings' also known as 'crockards' or 'pollards') into the country and exported our better quality coin for melting. As a result the law was changed to require them to bring silver into the country. This would then be minted (or more likely exchanged for already minted coin) at a rate favourable to the English exchequer which the merchants would then have to spend on goods they wished to buy. Basically the state has kept a close control on exchange rates for a every long time! Oh, and if anyone is curious about recent exchange rates (I use it to calculate overseas auction prices for coins sold a few years ago) this site might be of interest: http://www.x-rates.com/historical/ . Edited May 27, 2014 by TomGoodheart Quote
Colin G. Posted May 27, 2014 Posted May 27, 2014 Was just looking through your website Mr Peddie, can i just point you towards the CGS table as you have a CGS 78 on your website and have said its ABU, but that grading term does'nt start until at least a CGS 85 gradeDave I would not get too carried away with the CGS definitions, that was why they dropped back to numbers and removed the accompanying descriptive grade from the slabs. There are certainly examples of coins that would be described as Unc with full lustre that may not make it into the 85+ category due to a weaker strike, carbon spot or visible bag marks. The below coin is a prime example, it has full lustre, but has some light surface marks across the neck and is weak across the legs of Britannia. I thought this was a harsh grade for this coin.....I would have had no doubts describing this coin as BUNC if I was to sell it.http://www.coingradingservices.co.uk/?uin=0019880&page=coin_verification&Submit=Verify Quote
Paulus Posted May 27, 2014 Posted May 27, 2014 This is the coin that Colin has linked to, for those that do not wish to / cannot log in to CGS (it is graded 75): Quote
scott Posted May 28, 2014 Posted May 28, 2014 I stumbled across this oddity a few months ago, which may or may not fit into this threadFrench coin weight, however after some digging it turns out this was converted to 10s 6D weight for use over here. Quote
rpeddie Posted May 28, 2014 Author Posted May 28, 2014 thats the sort of thing am looking for from that whats the date and what was the weight originally used for with regards to french silverthen can see how the different silver weights match up Quote
rpeddie Posted May 28, 2014 Author Posted May 28, 2014 date being between 14 May 1643 1 September 1715 if it is Louis 14? quite a gap but its a time zone Quote
rpeddie Posted May 28, 2014 Author Posted May 28, 2014 im spamming but just thinking aloudalso being accurate it would need to assume that the people who made the weight in France and the ones who changed it to British weren't separated by a great deal in time no way to tell the second part as far as i can see there's no date for the British part Quote
scott Posted May 28, 2014 Posted May 28, 2014 (edited) the weight in UK is a Half Guinea, the French equivilant is the 1 pistol, earliest it could be is William III, although the style of the engraved text looks to be Georgean, so possibly as late as George IInot found any referance the the marks under bust, seens + as well as a star. Edited May 28, 2014 by scott Quote
HistoricCoinage Posted May 28, 2014 Posted May 28, 2014 date being between 14 May 1643 1 September 1715if it is Louis 14? quite a gap but its a time zone Not a huge gap. Assuming it was made c.1710 and the coin weight appears to date from 1750s-1770s then it's not that far. However, it could conceivably be one of the English-made ones for the French issues but a trader has subsequently altered it to suit British coins. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.