Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

hi, i have in my posesion a a 1970 5 new pence, Iv`e done a bit of research on it, looks like what they call a trial strike.

Struck in 1970 (remember we did not go decimal untill 1971)

There is a very faint image of Queen Elizibeth 11 and the date

On one side. On the other side is clear image of the 5 new pence

And thistle with crown aloft.

Another interesting feature is that the blank may have been too thin, this has caused the outer beaded ring to be pushed inwards. Can anyone tell me about it.

Posted

I think you would need to post up photos for members to comment on this properly. Although we didn't go decimal until 1971 I think that there were lots of proof coins struck with the 1970 date.

Posted

hi, i have in my posesion a a 1970 5 new pence, Iv`e done a bit of research on it, looks like what they call a trial strike.

Struck in 1970 (remember we did not go decimal untill 1971)

There is a very faint image of Queen Elizibeth 11 and the date

On one side. On the other side is clear image of the 5 new pence

And thistle with crown aloft.

Another interesting feature is that the blank may have been too thin, this has caused the outer beaded ring to be pushed inwards. Can anyone tell me about it.

Although we didn't go decimal until 1971, the new coins were produced from 1968 onwards. It is unlikely there is anything special about the coin.

Posted

hi, i have in my posesion a a 1970 5 new pence, Iv`e done a bit of research on it, looks like what they call a trial strike.

Struck in 1970 (remember we did not go decimal untill 1971)

There is a very faint image of Queen Elizibeth 11 and the date

On one side. On the other side is clear image of the 5 new pence

And thistle with crown aloft.

Another interesting feature is that the blank may have been too thin, this has caused the outer beaded ring to be pushed inwards. Can anyone tell me about it.

Although we didn't go decimal until 1971, the new coins were produced from 1968 onwards. It is unlikely there is anything special about the coin.

Sound like its had an acid dip.

Posted

The decimal 5p and 10p came out in 1968 1969 and 1970, before D-Day. The 50p arrived in 1969 and 1970. The bronzes were available from 1968 in sets, but none dated earlier than 1971. The 1970 5p is a common coin, yours may be very worn, or could be mis-struck, in which case please post pictures.

Posted

post-7618-080982200 1348902984_thumb.jpg

The decimal 5p and 10p came out in 1968 1969 and 1970, before D-Day. The 50p arrived in 1969 and 1970. The bronzes were available from 1968 in sets, but none dated earlier than 1971. The 1970 5p is a common coin, yours may be very worn, or could be mis-struck, in which case please post pictures.

Posted

post-7618-080982200 1348902984_thumb.jpg

The decimal 5p and 10p came out in 1968 1969 and 1970, before D-Day. The 50p arrived in 1969 and 1970. The bronzes were available from 1968 in sets, but none dated earlier than 1971. The 1970 5p is a common coin, yours may be very worn, or could be mis-struck, in which case please post pictures.

post-7618-048810600 1348903553_thumb.jpg

Posted

The decimal 5p and 10p came out in 1968 1969 and 1970, before D-Day. The 50p arrived in 1969 and 1970. The bronzes were available from 1968 in sets, but none dated earlier than 1971. The 1970 5p is a common coin, yours may be very worn, or could be mis-struck, in which case please post pictures.

Hi, thanx all for your info, iv`e tried upload photo. don`t know if it worked

Posted

It looks like it's been squashed. What diameter is it please Ray?

Posted

It looks like it's been squashed. What diameter is it please Ray?

Or, it could be a serious misstrike. Yes, the diameter is crucial, as the design looks as though it's been struck on a larger flan, but this would only be clear once we knew how it compares to a kosher 5p of the day. The overall appearance is of a coin that's been machined in some way. It does look weird.

Posted

It looks like it's been squashed. What diameter is it please Ray?

Hi, the diameter is 25mm, i just got hold of a 1970 5 new pence to compare it. It is only 22mm diameter.

The idea that it has bean crushed is looking likely.

I`le try to upload image. Thank you for your input.

post-7618-087351300 1349034071_thumb.jpg

Posted

post-7618-015532700 1349035479_thumb.jpg

It looks like it's been squashed. What diameter is it please Ray?

Or, it could be a serious misstrike. Yes, the diameter is crucial, as the design looks as though it's been struck on a larger flan, but this would only be clear once we knew how it compares to a kosher 5p of the day. The overall appearance is of a coin that's been machined in some way. It does look weird.

Hi, it is 25mm in diameter, just got hold of 1970 5 new pence to compare it. it is only 22mm in diameter so it could be the crushed idea. Thank you for your input. Ray.post-7618-015532700 1349035479_thumb.jpg

Posted

post-7618-015532700 1349035479_thumb.jpg

It looks like it's been squashed. What diameter is it please Ray?

Or, it could be a serious misstrike. Yes, the diameter is crucial, as the design looks as though it's been struck on a larger flan, but this would only be clear once we knew how it compares to a kosher 5p of the day. The overall appearance is of a coin that's been machined in some way. It does look weird.

Hi, it is 25mm in diameter, just got hold of 1970 5 new pence to compare it. it is only 22mm in diameter so it could be the crushed idea. Thank you for your input. Ray.post-7618-015532700 1349035479_thumb.jpg

Not a straightforward thing at all. The obverse looks exactly as if the entire coin was crushed, e.g. by a steamhammer or something. However, when you look at the reverse, it's totally different. The design is preserved as it was, and only the part outside of the beaded circle has been extended. That's not to rule out extreme pressure, but something has protected the reverse design.

  • 4 years later...
Posted

Now this is a much better condition new 5 pence i have a huge array of good condition old coins from 1 shilling, 2 shilling, half pennys, three pence, six pence 

1476190766090811548080.jpg

14761907988592091988066.jpg

1476190766090811548080.jpg

14761907988592091988066.jpg

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 8 months later...
Guest Neicey
Posted
On 28/09/2012 at 8:10 AM, ray said:

hi, i have in my posesion a a 1970 5 new pence, Iv`e done a bit of research on it, looks like what they call a trial strike.

Struck in 1970 (remember we did not go decimal untill 1971)

There is a very faint image of Queen Elizibeth 11 and the date

On one side. On the other side is clear image of the 5 new pence

And thistle with crown aloft.

Can anyone give me some information please 

 

Posted

It's normal. 5 pences were struck from 1968 onwards in preparation for decimalisation and stockpiled. If the detail is not clear, it will be worn and of no value over scrap

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 23 July 2017 at 11:54 AM, Rob said:

It's normal. 5 pences were struck from 1968 onwards in preparation for decimalisation and stockpiled. If the detail is not clear, it will be worn and of no value over scrap

Not quite - they (and 10p's) were indeed struck from 1968 - 1971, but they weren't stockpiled. They entered circulation each year to run alongside shillings and florins, which were no longer struck after 1966 and 1967.

Also in 1968, they introduced the blue plastic wallet sets of each decimal denomination from 10p down to 1/2p. However, the three bronze coins were dated 1971 and weren't legal tender until then.

  • 3 months later...
Posted

I have just come across a 1968 and a 170 five new pence the 1968 has been defaced with a hole drilled above the queens head for a chain or link to go through or it would have been in mint condition as the 1970 is can any one explain these coins as they are not supposed to exist

Posted
3 minutes ago, Guest drew14 said:

I have just come across a 1968 and a 170 five new pence the 1968 has been defaced with a hole drilled above the queens head for a chain or link to go through or it would have been in mint condition as the 1970 is can any one explain these coins as they are not supposed to exist

Maybe not, but defaced coins DO exist, and I've never heard of a prosecution in modern times for doing so. Those are very common coins by the way, so no real damage done from our point of view.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...
Test