Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've recently purchased this 1858/3 (?) penny and wonder whether anyone has a similar penny to compare? Michael Gouby's website concludes that the existence of an 8 over 3, as listed by Spink is unlikely. Any thoughts welcome.

post-5762-089439300 1319892092_thumb.jpg

Obverse

Posted

What it looks more like, is a damaged 8 (upper top loop) that was repunched. If it WAS a 3, it would be damaged in just the same way.

Very difficult to tell.

Posted

Hi accumulator - I went through exactly the same thought process a few months back. If you find the thread "Coin acquisition of the week" and type "1858" into the search bar with "This topic" as the criterion, you'll find the discussion with good clear pics. Rob and John Argentum were very helpful as I recall...

Posted

Whatever it is, its a nice coin. Now with the photo expansion with the iphone i can see obviously the top overstamped, also top inside right loop something in there and on the outside left, something there.

Unfortunately dunno what, not sure if it can be a 3 either with whatever is under the outside middle overstamp. A nice coin though

Posted

Whatever it is, its a nice coin. Now with the photo expansion with the iphone i can see obviously the top overstamped, also top inside right loop something in there and on the outside left, something there.

Unfortunately dunno what, not sure if it can be a 3 either with whatever is under the outside middle overstamp. A nice coin though

If you re-read my post, you will see that it could be a damaged 8 OR a damaged 3 die - if it was a damaged 3 that might explain the re-use with an overstamp. Or a damaged 8 might have been overstamped if the die broke when still young.

Posted

Whatever it is, its a nice coin. Now with the photo expansion with the iphone i can see obviously the top overstamped, also top inside right loop something in there and on the outside left, something there.

Unfortunately dunno what, not sure if it can be a 3 either with whatever is under the outside middle overstamp. A nice coin though

If you re-read my post, you will see that it could be a damaged 8 OR a damaged 3 die - if it was a damaged 3 that might explain the re-use with an overstamp. Or a damaged 8 might have been overstamped if the die broke when still young.

I read what you said Peck, but i don't think its an 8 either, mainly due to the date cutout picture where there's a noticable protrusion inbetween the centre of both loops on the outside on the left hand side, why would an 8 have a line jutting out? a 3s centre line could though

Posted

It just looks the 8 has been re-punched Steve and it has been punched slightly lower than the original.

The first and most obvious thing to strike you is the lack of WW from the truncation. For the die to be an earlier date than 1858 these initials must be there.

Posted

Whatever it is, its a nice coin. Now with the photo expansion with the iphone i can see obviously the top overstamped, also top inside right loop something in there and on the outside left, something there.

Unfortunately dunno what, not sure if it can be a 3 either with whatever is under the outside middle overstamp. A nice coin though

If you re-read my post, you will see that it could be a damaged 8 OR a damaged 3 die - if it was a damaged 3 that might explain the re-use with an overstamp. Or a damaged 8 might have been overstamped if the die broke when still young.

I read what you said Peck, but i don't think its an 8 either, mainly due to the date cutout picture where there's a noticable protrusion inbetween the centre of both loops on the outside on the left hand side, why would an 8 have a line jutting out? a 3s centre line could though

I don't see that at all. I only see the faint shadow of the top left corner of the lower loop of an 8, corresponding to the fact that the overstamp is LOWER than the original. I'm talking about the clear cut on the very top of the underlying figure - which looks like it could be a broken die. Could be, not certain.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...
Test