RLC35 Posted June 5, 2006 Posted June 5, 2006 I recently obtained a 1844 Farthing from a dealer in New York (obverse attached), and would like the opinion of the Forum on the grading. I purchased the coin as EF. The coin came in an envelope with the Name of Colin Cooke on it, but I am not sure of its pedigree. The reverve will be attached next. Thanks,BobHere is the Reverse Quote
Emperor Oli Posted June 5, 2006 Posted June 5, 2006 Looks EF to me, I think the wear on Britannia's shield, bust, and lower leg prevent it from going higher. Quote
RLC35 Posted June 5, 2006 Author Posted June 5, 2006 Looks EF to me, I think the wear on Britannia's shield, bust, and lower leg prevent it from going higher.Thanks. I appreciate the evaluation. I noticed the slight friction on the shield also. The coin is really much nicer than the photo shows. I have not mastered photographic lighting yet! <ggg>.Regards,Bob Quote
custard1966 Posted June 5, 2006 Posted June 5, 2006 I'd say it's just about EF. There's a noticeable loss of fine detail in Victoria's hair. Perhaps about EF would be fairer, but it's definitely better than GVF. It's really all about a dealer's consistency when considering these fairly fine distinctions.A nice, problem-free coin though. Quote
RLC35 Posted June 5, 2006 Author Posted June 5, 2006 I'd say it's just about EF. There's a noticeable loss of fine detail in Victoria's hair. Perhaps about EF would be fairer, but it's definitely better than GVF. It's really all about a dealer's consistency when considering these fairly fine distinctions.A nice, problem-free coin though.Custard,Great hearing from you again, and obtaining your opinion.Regards,Bob Quote
Bronze & Copper Collector Posted June 5, 2006 Posted June 5, 2006 I would concur with the above assessments.... Quote
RLC35 Posted June 5, 2006 Author Posted June 5, 2006 I would concur with the above assessments....Thanks Bronze and Copper. It looks like a consensus! Thanks for the reply.Regards,Bob Quote
custard1966 Posted June 5, 2006 Posted June 5, 2006 I'd say it's just about EF. There's a noticeable loss of fine detail in Victoria's hair. Perhaps about EF would be fairer, but it's definitely better than GVF. It's really all about a dealer's consistency when considering these fairly fine distinctions.A nice, problem-free coin though.Custard,Great hearing from you again, and obtaining your opinion.Regards,BobHi Bob,Glad to be of assistance Quote
Peter Posted June 6, 2006 Posted June 6, 2006 Is that a slight edge knock at 8 o'clock on the reverse ?Nice coin all the same and a beautiful tone. Quote
RLC35 Posted June 6, 2006 Author Posted June 6, 2006 Is that a slight edge knock at 8 o'clock on the reverse ?Nice coin all the same and a beautiful tone.Peter,You have a good eye...I didn't notice that myself. The coin is round, without any flattening of the edge, but the rim facing the reverse, does have a, ever so slight, contact just at the outer edge. Thanks for your observation, and your input.Regards,Bob. Quote
Guest English Coin Fanatic Posted June 9, 2006 Posted June 9, 2006 Is that a slight edge knock at 8 o'clock on the reverse ?Nice coin all the same and a beautiful tone.Peter,You have a good eye...I didn't notice that myself. The coin is round, without any flattening of the edge, but the rim facing the reverse, does have a, ever so slight, contact just at the outer edge. Thanks for your observation, and your input.Regards,Bob.EF in my opinion. Remember the obverse dies were "recycled" sovereign obverse dies and so have DIE WEAR as opposed to coin wear. Excellent details on Britannia with surface scuffing as noted. I would not be overly concerned with what may be light rim contact at the listed 8 o'clock reverse position - also recall that the photo is considerably enlarged over life-size.I suppose it would be rather gauche to inquire as to the price? Quote
RLC35 Posted June 9, 2006 Author Posted June 9, 2006 I really don't mind stating the price, at this point. I paid $520 dollars, or about 295 pounds. I think I may have paid the full value of the coin, but that is not uncommon for better quality pieces.Regards,Bob Quote
Guest English Coin Fanatic Posted June 10, 2006 Posted June 10, 2006 I really don't mind stating the price, at this point. I paid $520 dollars, or about 295 pounds. I think I may have paid the full value of the coin, but that is not uncommon for better quality pieces.Regards,BobFor what it is worth, that was a good buy in my opinion and would have done it. Some 2-3 years ago I got a RED 1849 in mint bought from a US dealer for just about 200 USD, and these dates along with perhaps the 1842 & maybe the '46 and '47 (though much lower in price) are finds in the EF and higher grades. Quote
Peter Posted June 10, 2006 Posted June 10, 2006 http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vie...Y_BIN_Stores_ITI don't think you paid too much Quote
RLC35 Posted June 11, 2006 Author Posted June 11, 2006 Peter,Thanks for the link. That is also a pretty decent coin, although the picture could use some more light. John has some nice coins, now and again. I buy off of eBay on occasion, but I never go by the grade they apply to the coin...too much disparity. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.