I OVER T Please can I ask opinions of the forum

[absence of uniformity]

3 hours ago, secret santa said:

By whom ?

Michael Gouby has confirmed the unrecorded overstrike.

The BNS also have the file.

[absence of uniformity]

4 hours ago, Coinery said:

🤷‍♂️

👍

[Peckris 2]

On 9/8/2026 at 9:24 PM, absence of uniformity said:

In the last 24 days there was only a single post other than this thread in this section of the forum, imo this thread counts as numismatic research and all the information is relevant to the subject. 

 

I was referring specifically to this thread, not your others.

[absence of uniformity]

57 minutes ago, Peckris 2 said:

I was referring specifically to this thread, not your others.

I'm sorry that it felt overwhelming. I mean that sincerely aswell.

Can you appreciate I just got carried away with the excitment of the discovery, and maybe should of kept it a bit more precise. Worth noting this whole process, the dos and donts, what order of process, who to speak to, what I can and cant say, its all completely new to me.

The analysis and the asociated research is a steep learning curve without any help or silence on the matter..

Its hard enough as it is discovering an unrecorded variety, then add in everything else! Rather than risk leaving out a piece of information that maybe valuable or important, I tried my best to include as much info as possible. Can you see my logic?

I actually sent Michael 11 images, and he thanked me for the "excellent images" in his own words.

Coinery last night was chucking around all kinds of insults and assumptions. Im just here to learn about coins, share my findings, and learn from all of you as much as I can.

Il take this opourtunity to formaly apologize to anyone I have offended along the journey so far. That includes coinery aswell.. To mention my social skills, he insulted me and yet Im the one apologising. Thats not juvenille.

I would like the focus of this thread to be about the question in hand, the discovery!

 A post-1864 unrecorded error letter variety is a significant discovery.. Rather than celebrating I feel like I have done something wrong.

 

 

 

 

[absence of uniformity]

1 hour ago, Peckris 2 said:

I was referring specifically to this thread, not your others.

Just one last point, last night my response to Peter was in response to Peter saying he thinks Im basicially wasting my time looking for coins nobody is interested in, and its only fair I repsond with the facts and my opinion.

That clearly put coinery over the edge but its me who is instigating, baiting etc

Had Peter of not shared his view on my research and collecting style, I would not feel obliged to share mine in light of this discovery.

In respect to your comment about being unhappy with the flood of images, where as Michael was thankful, I would not feel obliged to respond if that statement wasn't made previously. Can we not keep things amicable and coin centric?