Paddy Posted Tuesday at 08:39 AM Posted Tuesday at 08:39 AM Welcome back @seuk. I am sorry to hear about Gary, though I did not know him. He made a wise and altruistic decision in passing on his collection intact before he passed. Is/was the website I linked to above yours or his? Is it likely that it will ever be resurrected? It was a wonderful and powerful addition to our knowledge of counterfeit coins. 1 Quote
seuk Posted Tuesday at 10:52 PM Posted Tuesday at 10:52 PM 14 hours ago, Paddy said: Welcome back @seuk. I am sorry to hear about Gary, though I did not know him. He made a wise and altruistic decision in passing on his collection intact before he passed. Is/was the website I linked to above yours or his? Is it likely that it will ever be resurrected? It was a wonderful and powerful addition to our knowledge of counterfeit coins. Yes, the Steppeulvene page was mine - It just got to expensive to continue with it. Gary thought that I should have it, since I worked out a useful system of separating the main groups. I'm grateful that I got the chance to buy his collection and hope I can take the next step (which is a throughout study of the punches) later this year. 1 Quote
Chris Perkins Posted Tuesday at 10:59 PM Posted Tuesday at 10:59 PM 2 minutes ago, seuk said: Yes, the Steppeulvene page was mine - It just got to expensive to continue with it. Gary thought that I should have it, since I worked out a useful system of separating the main groups. I'm grateful that I got the chance to buy his collection and hope I can take the next step (which is a throughout study of the punches) later this year. Do you want a new place for it? It's such a shame that the pics are not available on the internet archive. My hosting provider doesn't charge me at all for low volume websites. I have a couple of small hobby websites of my own and also host for others (e.g. my friend Steve's https://www.thefakepoundcoindatabase.co.uk). There would be no charge of course! 1 Quote
seuk Posted Tuesday at 11:00 PM Posted Tuesday at 11:00 PM Made a mistake in my previous post. Right after I got back to Denmark I send Gary a few pre-Geroge III counterfeit shillings, for which he thanked me in a mail about a week later - And that was the last time I heard from him. As I understand his collection or part of it will be auctioned later this year. Quote
seuk Posted Tuesday at 11:05 PM Posted Tuesday at 11:05 PM 1 minute ago, Chris Perkins said: Do you want a new place for it? It's such a shame that the pics are not available on the internet archive. My hosting provider doesn't charge me at all for low volume websites. I have a couple of small hobby websites of my own and also host for others (e.g. my friend Steve's https://www.thefakepoundcoindatabase.co.uk). There would be no charge of course! Well, sure - that would be great! I thought the Internet Archive had it all by now - but it's not of much use without pictures. Quote
Chris Perkins Posted Tuesday at 11:08 PM Posted Tuesday at 11:08 PM 2 minutes ago, seuk said: Well, sure - that would be great! I thought the Internet Archive had it all by now - but it's not of much use without pictures. Great. Message me and we'll sort out the technicalities. 2 Quote
seuk Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago (edited) On 1/18/2026 at 7:47 PM, Unwilling Numismatist said: Certainly. This is a fairly common contemporary counterfeit. J015o / I801r in my current system. It's connected to a number of other dies of various groups - it's the 7th coin in this die chain Edited 3 hours ago by seuk 2 Quote
seuk Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago On 1/19/2026 at 3:05 PM, Ukstu said: Sad news about Gary. I never met him but heard lots of good things about him. He was born in the town i reside in. I just dug my shilling out as this post had sparked my interest. Never even noticed it before but it's got a clear overdate. 1817 over 1820. That's something i have never seen in a counterfeit coin before. Could you please upload a photo of the reverse - I don't think I have this variation. Quote
seuk Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago On 1/21/2026 at 2:44 AM, Ukstu said: The plot thickens. Another overdate spotted in the wild. Ebay. 1820 over 1819. Any sign of Seuk ? Love to know his take on these overdate forgeries it's strange yet fascinating. This obverse is uncommon - The only other one I've noticed is in Gary's collection. Do yours have the same reverse? 1 Quote
Ukstu Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 39 minutes ago, seuk said: Could you please upload a photo of the reverse - I don't think I have this variation. This is the reverse. Apologies for the image it was the best i could do at the minute without natural daylight. Edited 2 hours ago by Ukstu Quote
seuk Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago On 1/21/2026 at 10:57 AM, Unwilling Numismatist said: Even thicker, I have an 1819 in this box too! Another somewhat crude group C die - fairly common - Here's a better example. 2 Quote
Ukstu Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Here is the link to the other one i posted. It was one i spotted on ebay while looking around at other forgeries to see if i could find a die match to mine. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/277566687748 1 Quote
Unwilling Numismatist Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago Thank you @seuk this has been most informative! - If you'd be interested in my poor examples, please PM me your address and I'll pop them in the post. 1 Quote
seuk Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 24 minutes ago, Ukstu said: This is the reverse. Apologies for the image it was the best i could do at the minute without natural daylight. Reverse seems to be identical to my J914r which I've seen with 3 different obverses - and now there's a fourth... While corrected punches (or errors) are fairly common with counterfeit dies, a re-engraved date (or other parts of design) is rare. It may turn out to be an important coin for understanding the use of punches within the series - So, I would very much like to have a 1200 dpi scan or a clear set of photographs of both sides. 1 Quote
seuk Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 8 minutes ago, Unwilling Numismatist said: Thank you @seuk this has been most informative! - If you'd be interested in my poor examples, please PM me your address and I'll pop them in the post. Thank you so much for the offer! However, I have a few copies + probably another handful or more waiting in Gary's collection - so I should be covered with these types. 1 Quote
Ukstu Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 8 minutes ago, seuk said: Reverse seems to be identical to my J914r which I've seen with 3 different obverses - and now there's a fourth... While corrected punches (or errors) are fairly common with counterfeit dies, a re-engraved date (or other parts of design) is rare. It may turn out to be an important coin for understanding the use of punches within the series - So, I would very much like to have a 1200 dpi scan or a clear set of photographs of both sides. No problem. I do have a scanner. Hp Evny 4525. Think it's up to the job. I will dig it out and dust it off and scan it for you tommorow. Thank you for taking the time to look at it. Stu. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.