Paddy Posted Tuesday at 08:39 AM Posted Tuesday at 08:39 AM Welcome back @seuk. I am sorry to hear about Gary, though I did not know him. He made a wise and altruistic decision in passing on his collection intact before he passed. Is/was the website I linked to above yours or his? Is it likely that it will ever be resurrected? It was a wonderful and powerful addition to our knowledge of counterfeit coins. 1 Quote
seuk Posted Tuesday at 10:52 PM Posted Tuesday at 10:52 PM 14 hours ago, Paddy said: Welcome back @seuk. I am sorry to hear about Gary, though I did not know him. He made a wise and altruistic decision in passing on his collection intact before he passed. Is/was the website I linked to above yours or his? Is it likely that it will ever be resurrected? It was a wonderful and powerful addition to our knowledge of counterfeit coins. Yes, the Steppeulvene page was mine - It just got to expensive to continue with it. Gary thought that I should have it, since I worked out a useful system of separating the main groups. I'm grateful that I got the chance to buy his collection and hope I can take the next step (which is a throughout study of the punches) later this year. 1 Quote
Chris Perkins Posted Tuesday at 10:59 PM Posted Tuesday at 10:59 PM 2 minutes ago, seuk said: Yes, the Steppeulvene page was mine - It just got to expensive to continue with it. Gary thought that I should have it, since I worked out a useful system of separating the main groups. I'm grateful that I got the chance to buy his collection and hope I can take the next step (which is a throughout study of the punches) later this year. Do you want a new place for it? It's such a shame that the pics are not available on the internet archive. My hosting provider doesn't charge me at all for low volume websites. I have a couple of small hobby websites of my own and also host for others (e.g. my friend Steve's https://www.thefakepoundcoindatabase.co.uk). There would be no charge of course! 1 Quote
seuk Posted Tuesday at 11:00 PM Posted Tuesday at 11:00 PM Made a mistake in my previous post. Right after I got back to Denmark I send Gary a few pre-Geroge III counterfeit shillings, for which he thanked me in a mail about a week later - And that was the last time I heard from him. As I understand his collection or part of it will be auctioned later this year. Quote
seuk Posted Tuesday at 11:05 PM Posted Tuesday at 11:05 PM 1 minute ago, Chris Perkins said: Do you want a new place for it? It's such a shame that the pics are not available on the internet archive. My hosting provider doesn't charge me at all for low volume websites. I have a couple of small hobby websites of my own and also host for others (e.g. my friend Steve's https://www.thefakepoundcoindatabase.co.uk). There would be no charge of course! Well, sure - that would be great! I thought the Internet Archive had it all by now - but it's not of much use without pictures. Quote
Chris Perkins Posted Tuesday at 11:08 PM Posted Tuesday at 11:08 PM 2 minutes ago, seuk said: Well, sure - that would be great! I thought the Internet Archive had it all by now - but it's not of much use without pictures. Great. Message me and we'll sort out the technicalities. 2 Quote
seuk Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) On 1/18/2026 at 7:47 PM, Unwilling Numismatist said: Certainly. This is a fairly common contemporary counterfeit. J015o / I801r in my current system. It's connected to a number of other dies of various groups - it's the 7th coin in this die chain Edited 2 hours ago by seuk 2 Quote
seuk Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago On 1/19/2026 at 3:05 PM, Ukstu said: Sad news about Gary. I never met him but heard lots of good things about him. He was born in the town i reside in. I just dug my shilling out as this post had sparked my interest. Never even noticed it before but it's got a clear overdate. 1817 over 1820. That's something i have never seen in a counterfeit coin before. Could you please upload a photo of the reverse - I don't think I have this variation. Quote
seuk Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago On 1/21/2026 at 2:44 AM, Ukstu said: The plot thickens. Another overdate spotted in the wild. Ebay. 1820 over 1819. Any sign of Seuk ? Love to know his take on these overdate forgeries it's strange yet fascinating. This obverse is uncommon - The only other one I've noticed is in Gary's collection. Do yours have the same reverse? 1 Quote
Ukstu Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 39 minutes ago, seuk said: Could you please upload a photo of the reverse - I don't think I have this variation. This is the reverse. Apologies for the image it was the best i could do at the minute without natural daylight. Edited 1 hour ago by Ukstu Quote
seuk Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago On 1/21/2026 at 10:57 AM, Unwilling Numismatist said: Even thicker, I have an 1819 in this box too! Another somewhat crude group C die - fairly common - Here's a better example. 2 Quote
Ukstu Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Here is the link to the other one i posted. It was one i spotted on ebay while looking around at other forgeries to see if i could find a die match to mine. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/277566687748 1 Quote
Unwilling Numismatist Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago Thank you @seuk this has been most informative! - If you'd be interested in my poor examples, please PM me your address and I'll pop them in the post. 1 Quote
seuk Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 24 minutes ago, Ukstu said: This is the reverse. Apologies for the image it was the best i could do at the minute without natural daylight. Reverse seems to be identical to my J914r which I've seen with 3 different obverses - and now there's a fourth... While corrected punches (or errors) are fairly common with counterfeit dies, a re-engraved date (or other parts of design) is rare. It may turn out to be an important coin for understanding the use of punches within the series - So, I would very much like to have a 1200 dpi scan or a clear set of photographs of both sides. 1 Quote
seuk Posted 52 minutes ago Posted 52 minutes ago 8 minutes ago, Unwilling Numismatist said: Thank you @seuk this has been most informative! - If you'd be interested in my poor examples, please PM me your address and I'll pop them in the post. Thank you so much for the offer! However, I have a few copies + probably another handful or more waiting in Gary's collection - so I should be covered with these types. 1 Quote
Ukstu Posted 49 minutes ago Posted 49 minutes ago 8 minutes ago, seuk said: Reverse seems to be identical to my J914r which I've seen with 3 different obverses - and now there's a fourth... While corrected punches (or errors) are fairly common with counterfeit dies, a re-engraved date (or other parts of design) is rare. It may turn out to be an important coin for understanding the use of punches within the series - So, I would very much like to have a 1200 dpi scan or a clear set of photographs of both sides. No problem. I do have a scanner. Hp Evny 4525. Think it's up to the job. I will dig it out and dust it off and scan it for you tommorow. Thank you for taking the time to look at it. Stu. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.