Really? I know there is wear on them but I didn't think there was enough to call them scrap coins? If pulled from change in the 1960s, they would all be roughly in that condition, and would have been described then as "average circulated". Sorry. Ah well, they were a gift and fill the gaps in a very small collection. I was quite excited about them, a little less now :/ Awww. Well, if it's any consolation at all, we've all been there. All of us. No exceptions. I remember when I got my first UNC George V coin, I was so so pleased with it (still am, still got it ). So I make the toast to you that all coin collectors are happy to hear : a long life and happy collecting. Thanks, I have regained my excitement for them as I have been adding them to the collection, they are, as many have said on here " the best examples you can afford" (being free and me being poor currently). I look forward to upgrading them when I get the chance to. I do have to pose a question, I could be wrong with this but surely even low grade coins such as these shouldn't be considered scrap? Surely, like with me they are of value to people are starting off and received them from friends and relatives to start their collection, as incentives for the hobby and upgrading eventually?