RLC35 Posted October 18, 2013 Posted October 18, 2013 I recently bought a 1878 Farthing at a coin show. After I got home and was examining it, I found out it had a split "R" in Farthing. I thought it was probably as a result of being nicked, struck, or something like that, but after examining a few more 1878's, I found another one just like it out of the few I looked at. It appears it must be as a result of die damage, and not coin damage. Has anyone else found one like this? Quote
declanwmagee Posted October 18, 2013 Posted October 18, 2013 Well, how about that? 3 out of 3 in my archive... Quote
Peter Posted October 18, 2013 Posted October 18, 2013 Hi BobThe split R was normal around this period.1875 (ld) normal R1875 (sd) split R.I've just checked Colins site (aboutfarthings)and he has the split R as normal.In Colin Cookes 1/4d catalogue it notes all farthings 1875-78 are split R apart from LD 1875 and the Heaton mints. Quote
declanwmagee Posted October 18, 2013 Posted October 18, 2013 perhaps if you've found one that's not, Bob, that one's unusual! Quote
RLC35 Posted October 18, 2013 Author Posted October 18, 2013 perhaps if you've found one that's not, Bob, that one's unusual!I think you may have something there, Declan...LOL! Quote
Colin G. Posted October 18, 2013 Posted October 18, 2013 Yes all the royal mint issues 1875 - 1878 have forked R's to farthings, and even some 1879 farthings do show a trace of the underlying tail, although some attempt has been made to correct/remove the feature. It is a great identifier of a genuine 1875 small date farthing, because where people have taken an 1875H farthing and removed the H in an attempt to make it more collectable the R will only have the single tail.....bizarrely I recently acquired an example of an altered 1875H http://aboutfarthings.co.uk/cart/index.php?id_product=299&controller=product&id_lang=2 Quote
Peter Posted October 18, 2013 Posted October 18, 2013 Yes all the royal mint issues 1875 - 1878 have forked R's to farthings, and even some 1879 farthings do show a trace of the underlying tail, although some attempt has been made to correct/remove the feature. It is a great identifier of a genuine 1875 small date farthing, because where people have taken an 1875H farthing and removed the H in an attempt to make it more collectable the R will only have the single tail.....bizarrely I recently acquired an example of an altered 1875H http://aboutfarthings.co.uk/cart/index.php?id_product=299&controller=product&id_lang=2You couldn't make this up. BTWNVF 1875H about £2NVF 1875sd about £35 Quote
Colin G. Posted October 18, 2013 Posted October 18, 2013 Yes but the forked R is not then in "FARTHING" for that date Quote
Peckris Posted October 20, 2013 Posted October 20, 2013 I'm not sure it's correct to call this a "split R"? If you knitted the split together, you would have a very fat end to the curve. The lower portion looks like the proper R, while the question is, what caused the upper portion?I have an 1862 farthing with a 6 that also looks 'split', though in that case it might be an repunched alignment. Quote
Colin G. Posted October 20, 2013 Posted October 20, 2013 Peck you are correct the 6 shown on your farthing and the R on Scott's example are both as a result of letters/digits being recut/repunched. The R in FARTHING on the royal mint farthings from 1875 - 1878 is not. It is however difficult to have any certainty why it is present and how it was produced. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.