Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

Piece of junk. It doesn't even say what the face value is supposed to be, so how can it be a 'coin'?

Posted

The Gold one looks crap, not even a proof with 2012 mintage, it actually looks very rough

Posted

Now that is one ugly beast thats needs to be sent to "cash for gold"

What are the mint playing at?

Posted

Now that is one ugly beast thats needs to be sent to "cash for gold"

What are the mint playing at?

Uglier than a churchill crown ?.

Posted

In his magnificent design for the gold kilo coin for the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games, Sir Anthony has remained true to his sculptural ideals, creating an imposing design that took all the skill of the Royal Mint’s hugely experienced craftsman to embody.

Anyone want a job, says a lot for their craftsmen, they obviously have blind monkeys working for them

Posted

As an Antony Caro medallion, it's fine. Possibly even desirable. It's just not a coin IMHO. Though I notice the obverse wasn't illustrated ..

Posted

Piece of junk. It doesn't even say what the face value is supposed to be, so how can it be a 'coin'?

I agree it looks hideous, but not all coins need a face value - e.g. Mexican Libertad silver bullion coins have no face value, though they do state the amount and purity of silver they contain and the year and are not unattractive coins.

Posted

Piece of junk. It doesn't even say what the face value is supposed to be, so how can it be a 'coin'?

Agree!

A coin to me has to be a means of trade. Doesn't need to be legal tender, the test is whether it could ever be used or ws intended to be used in a transaction - such as tokens or jetons used for accounting, even communion pieces or theatre tickets

I'll also accept proofs and patterns, if they are examples or prototypes of real coins

Art medals are not coins.

I wish cataloguers would confine such NCLT crap to the back of the book. Spinks take note! Krause are beginning to see sense, moving quite a bit to their "Unusual Coins" volume

David

(in grumpy old man mode)

Posted

Piece of junk. It doesn't even say what the face value is supposed to be, so how can it be a 'coin'?

Agree!

A coin to me has to be a means of trade. Doesn't need to be legal tender, the test is whether it could ever be used or ws intended to be used in a transaction - such as tokens or jetons used for accounting, even communion pieces or theatre tickets

I'll also accept proofs and patterns, if they are examples or prototypes of real coins

Art medals are not coins.

I wish cataloguers would confine such NCLT crap to the back of the book. Spinks take note! Krause are beginning to see sense, moving quite a bit to their "Unusual Coins" volume

David

(in grumpy old man mode)

Well I suppose if you want to be technical about it David, it fits your criteria in one respect, it was indeed intended to be used in a transaction and traded. Whoever wants one has to part with a lot of cash in trade to get it.

It's the devil in me I am afraid...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...
Test