Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've mentioned this earlier on the coinsgbforum - not sure how much unrecorded it is as I don't have much litterature...

post-6657-038836400 1304386368_thumb.jpg

As one can see the stop between ET is clear while the one between TE is weak.

I found it with two different obverses and it seems fairly common

post-6657-089081400 1304386790_thumb.jpg

post-6657-009086900 1304386817_thumb.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

It transpires that I've got one of these too from the same reverse die, but it may be an earlier strike than yours. You can see the die is getting progressively blocked. On my coin, the legend at 9 o'clock is already blocked on the H & R, but the shield at 12 o'clock is not as blocked as yours on the lower grade piece which has only half of the line around the rampant lion remaining. The weak stop between T & E also appears to be a bit stronger. Having said that, even in the hand, my coin shows the shield up or not depending on the angle of illumination, so it is difficult to say definitively which is the earliest strike of the 3.

post-381-040997900 1306851509_thumb.jpg

Edited by Rob
Posted (edited)

I think the obverse die of mine may also be different. It's difficult to say though as the image of your better one is a bit small on my screen.

post-381-059001100 1306852668_thumb.jpg

Edited by Rob
Posted

I think the obverse die of mine may also be different. It's difficult to say though as the image of your better one is a bit small on my screen.

It's very close but looks slighly different than my 'first' obverse

post-6657-015821500 1307039413_thumb.jpg

Posted

I think the obverse die of mine may also be different. It's difficult to say though as the image of your better one is a bit small on my screen.

It's very close but looks slighly different than my 'first' obverse

post-6657-015821500 1307039413_thumb.jpg

I think this is normal for the series. I have a 1787 shilling where that particular stop is MUCH smaller than the ones on either side.

Posted

I think this is normal for the series. I have a 1787 shilling where that particular stop is MUCH smaller than the ones on either side.

It's not uncommon with missing or tiny stops due to metal fillings (die block). But are you saying that you have a shilling with stop between ET like this Sixpence?

I have 30 different reverse dies of the shilling, none of these have a stop between ET

Posted

I think this is normal for the series. I have a 1787 shilling where that particular stop is MUCH smaller than the ones on either side.

It's not uncommon with missing or tiny stops due to metal fillings (die block). But are you saying that you have a shilling with stop between ET like this Sixpence?

I have 30 different reverse dies of the shilling, none of these have a stop between ET

I'll have to have a look. Never studied my 1787s that close.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...
Test