Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yep! I'd say Second coinage (1526-44) of Bishop Tunstall (Durham) Spinks S2354 or North 1813. A commoner type. Nice condition though! :D

Posted

In Spink it says the star mint mark is 1514-26, but also the CD beside the shield makes it the one you said but the dat it gives is 1530-, how can the mint mark date be different from the date given to shields with CD either side?

Posted (edited)

I see what you mean! But it seems to be over large, if you check the picture in Spinks, you'll see what I mean. Perhaps a late addition or to obliterate another mark? Many of these marks were used by the minter for their own purposes. What do other members think?

Edited by Geordie582
Posted

Where are all the Hammered collectors? No-one have any thoughts on this coin - I'm just interested :lol:

Posted

These are commonly referred to as Sovereign pennies, because the portrait was similar to the one used on the Sovereign as opposed to the usual front facing image of the monarch.

Posted (edited)

The Star mint mark still bothers me! It is just too large. It would seem to have been added later, though for the life of me, I can't think of a valid reason they would deface the original mark and you would expect a late addition to be incused. :huh:

Edited by Geordie582
Posted

No idea Geordie why they'd do that!

As for where are the hammered collectors? :D I'm afriad the Tudors are way after my period of focus so i don't know much about them beyond the basics.

Posted (edited)

Do you agree with me that the 'star' is just too large? It even breaks the inner circle! :huh:

Could it be, following the 'Sede Vacante' period of 1529-30, they just used the unmarked pennies (S2353) and added the initials and the mint mark later? (though how they'd manage to do that escapes me)

Edited by Geordie582
Posted

I've gone and pulled out the Coincraft on this.

The size of the mintmark doesn't look too far of in my opinion (i think the fact that it's worn gives it the impression it's bigger). It is however definately moving over the inner circle which appears to be unusual.

Initials are on the reverse so it could be a mule. It could of course be an unrecognised variety.

The obverse dies might have had the star punched in later (before the coin was struck) with a worn punch, if done by hand it only takes a slight slip to go over the line.

Posted (edited)

Good analysis, Sylvester. I agree. I suppose a lot of re-use of dies must have been usual in those days. I don't suppose they were that easy to make, hence the elevated position of 'Mint Master'. An interesting coin for any collection! :D

By the way, It is not my area either. A bit late for me, really.

Edited by Geordie582
Posted (edited)

I'd say you could pick one up for £5-10 on ebay! I've got one of Henry VII, about the same value, for £3 +p&p ( but it broke in the post!) :angry:

post-226-1166037920_thumb.jpg

post-226-1166037936_thumb.jpg

Edited by Geordie582
Posted

A nicely nibbled coin.

I wonder where the line was drawn when a coin would be accepted or not.

Apparrently in the 18C the Scots loved the copper evasions.

Posted

iI've asked that question before. The practice of cutting pieces out to prove the quality of the silver was quite common, so, unless everyone carried weigh scales, they were always being "short changed". :huh:

Posted

I agree! But mine is 20 years older than yours :P

Posted (edited)

Key mm is Henry VII (Spinks 2235). That puts it in his reign 1485-1509 (York Mint Archb. Rotherham) :rolleyes

Keys were placed on Henry VIII coins, but on profile portrate types andBelow Halfpennies.

Edited by Geordie582

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...
Test