Jacqui Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago (edited) Thank you to everyone who helped with the Queen Anne coin back in July. I have found some more coins in my brother’s things. Google tells me this one is Queen Mary. It is 2.5 cm diameter. Any information much appreciated. He found it in a rubbish pile about 20 years ago, along with what look like Dutch coins and old pennies, and a really worn heavy bronze coin. Edited 7 hours ago by Jacqui missing image Quote
Rob Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 1 minute ago, Jacqui said: Thank you to everyone who helped with the Queen Anne coin back in July. I have found some more coins in my brother’s things. Google tells me this one is Queen Mary. It is 2.5 cm diameter. Any information much appreciated. He found it in a rubbish pile about 20 years ago, along with what look like Dutch coins and old pennies, and a really worn heavy bronze coin. A picture tells a thousand words. Image limit size is 500k per post, so if exceeded, leave the thread and rejoin with the next 500k. Quote
Jacqui Posted 7 hours ago Author Posted 7 hours ago Yes, sorry I didn't realise that was posted. I had to transfer to desktop to reduce the photo file size, so it should be there soon.Both phoos were too big Quote
Rob Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago It looks Scottish, but my books are at home and I'm not, so someone else has to chip in with a reference number/value. Quote
Coinery Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago That’s a super-crude counterfeit, surely? Would a Scottish coin have English titles on it, I can’t say that I’d know? Quote
Rob Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Coinery said: That’s a super-crude counterfeit, surely? Would a Scottish coin have English titles on it, I can’t say that I’d know? Maybe, I don't know. That's why I said perhas someone else has the books to check for references and values. I see few Scottish coins apart from the early pennies, or the much more common milled bits. Quote
Coinery Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago (edited) I felt like I recognised it from something I had around 20 years ago, so been digging around my images. Here’s one I used to have, which was pewter (or not silver at least). They are identical and, given the similarity of ‘strike,’ and the fact mine looks like a genuine field-find, I’d say they were both contemporary cast counterfeits (cast, rather than hammered from dies). Edited 3 hours ago by Coinery Quote
Rob Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Sorted then. Well done. Those who don't like keeping reference books/records, please note. 1 Quote
Jacqui Posted 3 hours ago Author Posted 3 hours ago Thank you! Contemporary as in with the real coin? someone had dumped the contents of their car ashtray/ other rubbish out of their window and brother was cleaning it up. Quote
Coinery Posted 59 minutes ago Posted 59 minutes ago Contemporary with the times, I’d say, as in intended to be spent. I’m basing the above solely on the fact my own example looks like it has been in the ground for some years. However, that’s not to say someone didn’t beat my piece up to make it look like an old coin? This has been known, but I suspect it would not have been worth it to beat any modern copy up this much, in the hope of making a few quid? Value? I wouldn’t have expected to get more than a tenner for my coin when it sold, so I likely didn’t even get that much. People do collect genuine (😊) counterfeits, so you may get lucky on eBay, but don’t expect too much. Quote
Coinery Posted 53 minutes ago Posted 53 minutes ago It’s meant to represent a groat, by the way. Quote
Jacqui Posted 30 minutes ago Author Posted 30 minutes ago Thank you. I just weighed it don’t know why I didn’t think of that before. It wouldn’t be a convincing fake as weighs 5.62g. So assuming it’s a newer reproduction from a museum shop or something. Other coins in the heap seem fine. But not interesting. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.