Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

to me its looks mis shaped, most of my milled coins are more circular, with this one I would appreciate any opinions

the 1692 looks .......wonky ? would this have been turned out this way or happened through circulation?

  

6 william III.jpg

6 william III 1 jpg.jpg

Posted

Circulation damage I would say.

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Paddy said:

Circulation damage I would say.

 

Many thanks, I've spotted a typo, its meant to read 1996 not "the 1692 looks .......wonky ?" its been a long day......🥱💤

Posted

The typos keep coming! I think you mean 1696, not 1996!

I knew what you meant the first time, so I didn't comment.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...
Test