Citizen H Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago to me its looks mis shaped, most of my milled coins are more circular, with this one I would appreciate any opinions the 1692 looks .......wonky ? would this have been turned out this way or happened through circulation? Quote
Citizen H Posted 34 minutes ago Author Posted 34 minutes ago 1 hour ago, Paddy said: Circulation damage I would say. Many thanks, I've spotted a typo, its meant to read 1996 not "the 1692 looks .......wonky ?" its been a long day......🥱💤 Quote
Paddy Posted 23 minutes ago Posted 23 minutes ago The typos keep coming! I think you mean 1696, not 1996! I knew what you meant the first time, so I didn't comment. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.