zookeeperz Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 Well hold me down and call me matilda The debate that rages on and on about 1826/5 1825/6 is there one and which is it. Well hopefully I can shed some light to this argument. Seems it's my week for finding something I will post a better pic once it lands on blighty shores. It is enroute as we speak. Clearly and unmistakably 1825 struck over 6 1 Quote
zookeeperz Posted March 14, 2018 Author Posted March 14, 2018 1 minute ago, mick1271 said: I don't see it ,I see a damaged 6 . your looking at a 5 mick the 6 is underneath it. get your windows magnifier out and you will see it Quote
mick1271 Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, zookeeperz said: your looking at a 5 mick the 6 is underneath it. get your windows magnifier out and you will see it I have magnified it ,still dont see anything but a damaged 6 that resembles a 5 .I don't see the normal 5 shape in it , but it has all the characteristics of a 6 Edited March 14, 2018 by mick1271 extra info Quote
Unwilling Numismatist Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 I totally see a 5 over a mangled 6. 1 Quote
Unwilling Numismatist Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 (edited) Plain as day. Below is a normal 6, which doesn't have straight fatures. Edited March 14, 2018 by Unwilling Numismatist Quote
jelida Posted March 15, 2018 Posted March 15, 2018 As Zookeeperz will know, I frequently disagree with the varieties proposed, but this one looks good even to me. Nice spot, look forward to your own photos. Jerry 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.