Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ignore that! It's minimum EF but the downside are the scuff marks on the obverse. It doesn't look polished as Peter suggests, but it may well have been wiped quite hard with an unsuitable cloth.

Posted

Silver dip? Harsh cleaning and not near EF.Sorry to disagree Peck but this is what a good forum debate is about. I personally couldn't give it a place in my collection.

Maybe 2/8d and flip asap. Maybe the boiled egg treatment could calm it down.

Posted

Yeah, possibly dipped, and I wouldn't have it in my collection either.

As for the wear, the reverse photo is not in focus so difficult to judge, but the obvious bits of the portrait - finer hair detail, ear, nose, chin, edge of bust - show virtually no signs of wear so I'd have to give minimum "EF for wear" on that alone.

Posted

If it's anything like my coins in photographs its probably 10x better in the hand than from top down photo with all the light on 1 side. reverse although a little off focus looks lustered obverse has all the detail of an EF . Just a little bright for my taste  but we know pictures are very deceptive. I could show you a coin and you would all prob say VF. But if you saw it in the hand you would know it's UNC. 3D object with 2D image are mostly unflattering IMO for what it's worth :)

 

  • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...
Test