Jump to content
British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

50 Years of RotographicCoinpublications.com A Rotographic Imprint. Price guide reference book publishers since 1959. Lots of books on coins, banknotes and medals. Please visit and like Coin Publications on Facebook for offers and updates.

Coin Publications on Facebook

   Rotographic    

The current range of books. Click the image above to see them on Amazon (printed and Kindle format). More info on coinpublications.com

predecimal.comPredecimal.com. One of the most popular websites on British pre-decimal coins, with hundreds of coins for sale, advice for beginners and interesting information.

Sign in to follow this  
mick1271

1858 shilling unbarred A's

Recommended Posts

I just bought an 1858 shilling and found out it has unbarred A's in GRATIA and BRITANNIA .Is it a common error ? Bought as a slight upgrade to the one I had which has barred A's .

Will post pics when I work out how to Lol

Edited by mick1271

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No automatic alt text available.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No automatic alt text available.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not the clearest ,but they are obvious with the naked eye (not mines , my eyes are done) 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They aren't a genuine variety as such - unless you count clogged dies as such. There are very many such errors in the 19th Century. However some guides will list them so if they're in Davies (for example) then they're worth cataloguing as a variety, otherwise file them as a curio.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply .I will list it as an error then .

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They aren't errors per se, rather the result of die use. Just an example of natural wear and tear, i.e. no mistake has been made at any point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish i could get better pics up .a couple of the A's are more like triangles ,as if the serifs are joined together with no bar .its quite an interesting coin .as you say ,its wear and tear .the one i was replacing has bars ,but they are weaker than they should be .so are obviously an earlier strike .

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, mick1271 said:

I wish i could get better pics up .a couple of the A's are more like triangles ,as if the serifs are joined together with no bar .its quite an interesting coin .as you say ,its wear and tear .the one i was replacing has bars ,but they are weaker than they should be .so are obviously an earlier strike .

 

Putting the two coins in chronological order assumes you have two coins from the same die pair. Mintages in Coin Yearbook gives over 3m 1858 shillings, so we are talking about a few dozen die pairs, at least. I'd have a quid on them being different dies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The odds are against them being from the same dies ,but how common are the Unbarred A's ? The only one I could find was on Michael Goubys website ,with quite a hefty price tag (£125 for a F+).I suppose If they are say 1 in 20 (5% population) then the probability is higher that they are the same die .They could be  common ,that is what I was really trying to ascertain from the more knowledgeable collectors like yourself ,Rob 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sh1858GRA.gifThis isn't mine ( borrowed from Michael Goubys site, hope thats ok  ),but It is identical to mine .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is my 1858 obverse. A mixture of barred and unbarred and nearly filled with some recutting to boot. Same die as either of yours?

 

087 - Copy.JPG

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And the reverse if you want to check for a die match

088 - Copy.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Rob said:

And the reverse if you want to check for a die match

088 - Copy.JPG

Very nice ,I will have a look when the kids go to bed and calm returns to the household lol.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's definitely a different reverse (the 1st 8 and 5 are different .The obverse may be the same ( the wear on mine makes it more difficult to confirm),but if I had to put money on it I would say they are different too .It seems odd that different dies of the same year would clog in the same places .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The other one I have of a lesser grade (with barred A's) appears to be the same dies as yours .Think I need to get a copy of Davies or ESC ,what would you recommend ?I already have Grooms .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, mick1271 said:

The other one I have of a lesser grade (with barred A's) appears to be the same dies as yours .Think I need to get a copy of Davies or ESC ,what would you recommend ?I already have Grooms .

It depends on what you want to collect. Davies goes back to 1816 only but has better detailed info. ESC goes back to 1649, but the latest revision is a disaster unless you have a previous edition to reference against. If you want a copy of Davies, PM me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, mick1271 said:

It's definitely a different reverse (the 1st 8 and 5 are different .The obverse may be the same ( the wear on mine makes it more difficult to confirm),but if I had to put money on it I would say they are different too .It seems odd that different dies of the same year would clog in the same places .

It isn't the fact that different dies of the same year clog in the same place, rather the same characters that get filled time and time again. Unbarred As occur throughout the milled series. Sometimes described as inverted Vs for As, the crossbars were initially added to form the A and so you need a mint state example or thereabouts to show there is no trace of the crossbar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like Davies would be the one to go for as my early milled are sporadic at best. My collection is mainly  modern milled ,some are not the best condition ,but they are getting upgraded regularly .I will pm you Rob ,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, mick1271 said:

It sounds like Davies would be the one to go for as my early milled are sporadic at best. My collection is mainly  modern milled ,some are not the best condition ,but they are getting upgraded regularly .I will pm you Rob ,

Note Davies lists values which are virtually meaningless, dating back to 1982. However, comparing values can be a useful indication to how rare a particular variety is (or was, in the early 80s).

Edited by Peckris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I agree in general although a few issues thought scarce have since proved not and vice versa. Glad to have that as a reference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×