Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

mrbadexample

Accomplished Collector
  • Posts

    2,085
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    65

Everything posted by mrbadexample

  1. I'd have said not fully struck up, or you'd see the wear elsewhere too.
  2. I don't think I've got a common date that nice!
  3. Enough with the washers Pete, haven't you got a decent one to share?
  4. I understand that it's not worth the time or trouble to list and sell individually. Instead of chucking them in the melting pot, how about you chuck them in a not-for-melting pot, then every 6 months or so offer them on here as mixed low grade varieties for a very modest sum. You'd get a little more than scrap and you'd not be destroying them.
  5. I would have been pleased to save them from the melting pot.
  6. I thought the F164a was one of those that was off! 20? I'm pretty sure as a forum we could rustle up that many without too much trouble - doesn't even warrant a mention on Richard's site. I thought the 1922 trident dot was way off at 10 too. I haven't had chance to have a proper look through yet but I would certainly agree with your last point, albeit with exceptions like the 1887 coronation head which needs chucking in the bin*. *Other opinions are available and no less valid, I guess.
  7. Nor me. I'd say some are way off the mark.
  8. Thanks all. To me the 1950 looked cleaned, not sure about the 1936. I can't even say why for sure, it just looks a bit unnaturally shiny to me. It could just be the lighting, of course.
  9. Question as per title. Yes or no please. Not mine, not buying, just after opinions. Cheers.
  10. I don't think it's legit though, that 9 on the reverse looks iffy.
  11. In my population of two I have two flat-bottomed 2s.
  12. I'm convinced there are actually relatively few collectors compared to the number of profiteers.
  13. Pobjoy mint have been going longer than I thought.
  14. That farthing is beautiful. I bought this a few years ago. Well pleased when it turned up. There's a prooflike quality to the fields that I am unable to capture.
  15. Somewhere between the two I guess. I can't get my head round photography, I just stick 'em on the windowsill on top of a coin box and point and press an old Fuji Finepix F500EXR. It mostly works ok. I tried one of these much-vaunted mats as a different background to the box - completely different colours as a result:
  16. Not. USA has no jurisdiction here.
  17. I'm a bit disappointed with mine. I dropped a coin on it but it still dented the desk.
  18. Can you upload the video to YouTube and then post a link or embed it here?
  19. Have another go then.
  20. Don't worry Pete, I've never seen a video of a coin that was better than a photograph.
  21. I go by the tie ribbon if I'm looking at the obverse.
  22. As well as the 1853 and 1871. A quick £350 to boost the coffers. Interestingly, the fakes are private listings with bidders' identities hidden, but other auctions are not.
  23. It's £25 less you've got to spend on the real thing.
×
×
  • Create New...
Test