ChKy

1 Mark 1875 A 0.900 silver Berlin mint Jaeger No. 9

Austria 1 Heller 1910 Bronze

4 Pfennig 1932 A Berlin mint Jaeger No. 315 Bronze

10 Pfennig 1914 E Muldenhütten mint Jaeger No. 13 Cu-Ni

10 Pfennig 1914 D Munich mint Jaeger No. 13 Cu-Ni

10 Pfennig 1912 D Munich mint Jaeger No. 13 Cu-Ni

Luxembourg 10 Centimes 1870 William III Utrecht mint Bronze

the link is shortend in the post. Please keep in mind to use the full internet address and please do not insert it as a link into the auction. The ebay member has to copy the link and to paste it into the browser

Dear fellow collectors! You can do me a favour. Please add following text into your ebay item descriptions: Attention fellow collectors! If you want to continue to collect coins, then please be sure to join! THE MATTER IS URGENT!!! Please read and sign the online petition and share the link!!! Simply copy the link, put it into your browser and give your voice, it is even possible to remain anonymous! THANKS A LOT! https://www.openpetition.de/petition/online/fuer-den-erhalt-des-privaten-sammelns Many thanks

For that reason, once again: https://www.openpetition.de/petition/online/fuer-den-erhalt-des-privaten-sammelns Please vote in favour of our hobby!

many thanks! But I am afraid that will come to an sudden end after that restrictive law comes into power... Someone on Youtube tried to explain that situation (that guy is a bit of confused, but still presents lots of information)...

Many thanks. And to be honest, I have an easy & direct source for that kind of material.

10 Pfennig 1935 A Berlin mint Jaeger-No. 317 Cu-Al-Zn

2 Pfennig 1923 A Berlin mint Jaeger-No. 307 Bronze

20 Pfennig 1888 J Hamburg mint Jaeger-No. 6 Cu-Ni

Bavaria 1 Kreuzer 1869 0.166 silver

Taken from a German coin forum: http://www.numismatikforum.de/viewtopic.php?f=88&t=52977&start=420

It will be articulated to the members of parliament in any case. But the 120,000 must be residents of Germany in order to get a statement from the parliamentarians. Regardless to that every vote coming from outside enhances the political weight as well. This lets our parliament and our society know that people from all over the world are monitoring there decisions. The more votes are collected, the more interesting it is for newspapers & magazines to make that problem public. Until now the commision tried to develop the law "under the public radar". The main issue is, that we have to make this petition public all over the globe and activate as many collectors as possible (from various collecting fields, not coins only as stated out before)... This exactly is what I am trying to say. Prevent other governments of western countries in preparing similar plans

Yet there are 4,805 supporters. Please sign that petition, let other people now, distribute that petition throughout social media network and other collectors forums (eg books, stamps, ceramics, gramophone records, ect) Here the link once again: https://www.openpetition.de/petition/online/fuer-den-erhalt-des-privaten-sammelns

Many thanks for your post. Most likely that the case of Gurlitt had an impact on this. Still that law proposal will destroy collecting of common people, serving particular interests of fundamentalist archaeologists. I doubt that it would help to rescue cultural heritage and more important to enhance public interest in cultural heritage.

Here a radio-interview regarding that topic (in German only, sorry) http://www.deutschlandfunk.de/online-petition-kunsthaendler-wehren-sich-gegen.691.de.html?dram:article_id=326299

https://www.openpetition.de/petition/online/fuer-den-erhalt-des-privaten-sammelns?language=en_GB.utf8 Here a citation from that particular web side The stipulations of the amendment of the law on the Protection of Cultural Heritage threaten the collecting of cultural objects by private individuals. This law will effect everybody specialized in traditional collecting fields, such as books, stamps, furniture, ceramics, coins, classic cars and paintings. Retroactively, this new law will impose due diligence guidelines that are impossible to follow even for the most meticulous collector. When it comes to a dispute, the law will require, by reversing the burden of proof, the owner of a “cultural good” with a value of at least 2,500 euros to provide proof as to the item’s provenance for the previous 20 years; this affects “archaeological cultural goods” with a value as low as 100 euros. This is an unrealistic demand which misrepresents most of the objects that are currently traded on the domestic and the international art market in full accordance with the law as being illegal, and will result in a considerable decline in value of the objects in question. We therefore demand a law on the Protection of Cultural Heritage that observes the following principles: • No retroactive effect of the law • No reversal of the burden of proof • A clear definition of the term “national cultural heritage” and a limit to claims by the state to “national cultural heritage” only • Free movement, unimpaired by bureaucratic obstacles, of cultural goods which are not classified as “natural cultural heritage”, EU-wide, according to the free movement of goods • An appropriate participation by the parties representing collectors and dealers in the law-making process For centuries collectors have protected cultural heritage. Private collecting adds to national efforts and promotes the tradition’s preservation in all its variety, in a way museums alone could never accomplish. Collecting is an immaterial cultural heritage that is currently threatened by the latest drafts of the new German law on the Protection of Cultural Heritage. In the name of all signers.

Dear Rob. There is no doubt, that you are an educated and reflective person. But I think you are trapped in that kind of conservative thinking. I have to hear and read that kind of information every day articulated by my own government. And most of these political parties are trapped in the same pitfall. The labour party (SPD) does deserve this name any more, she is as conservative as the party of Angela Merkel (CDU) in my view. To make it clear, the monetary system with credit money including the highly speculative banking sector will cost us (as a society) much more than the social system ever did. The social insurance is a part of payment for the working people. Integrating the DDR was paid by pillaging the public pension funds BTW! To say it again: The last decades, governments cutted down peoples life standard and salary several times. These people continuously had to pay more money for lesser quality. The wages (including social & public service) were cut down, but the financial situation (not only in Greece) became worse. The benefits of the cuttings were transfered to banks, fonds, investors & share holders. If this continues we all will have Greek conditions soon.

A comment by nobel prize winner about that issue: http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/07/12/killing-the-european-project/ That is true, sad but true... Still it is all about the ideology, it is a matter of enforcing the own oppinion. It is a matter how we choose to live in our country and the European Union. The last decades the living standard of Western people were cut down dramatically and public services were privatised. Public transportation, drinking water supply, postal service, waste disposal. These are things we depend on and these things can not be given into private hands. Private companies get hands on important, monopoly functions of our society. It is a matter of time to get ripped-off by these companies. So the costs were cut down for the state, but the saved money indeed... That is neoliberal politics, which does harm all of us. You might remember that the British government sold the British gold reserve for a ridiculous low price? Well... neoliberalism tries to erase the real-estate gold from peoples mind.... Here a very good talk given by economist Richard D Wolff, you should take your time and listen: