Rob

If the 16 include the D1/2, a decent Sceptre and the AVSSPCE, count me in for £2K. The first is particularly unattractive.

Unfortunately East Anglia is nowhere near where I live. My local soil is sandy, to the extent that a couple feet down you can use it straight from the ground for mortar, but much of the local soil contains a few hundred years of industrial activity. Mind you, things are getting better. I remember seeing a duck on the river in 1978-9 for the first time since I had moved to Manchester, and now it even has fish because someone pulled a 14lb pike out 5 years ago.

And for good measure, here's one that hasn't been dipped or dug. A Charles I York shilling with nearly all its original lustre. Just a bit missing off the top left serif of the XII and thinning on the cheekbone.

The Cambridge Cnut penny I have for sale on the website is not cleaned. There was a hoard that all came out looking like this. The soil on the east side of the country is dry and sandy in many instances, so you get fewer water damaged surfaces. It's the continual contact with water or at least regular contact and what is in solution that causes the change in tones. The tone of one coin is usually replicated through the hoard, reflecting the common exposure.

I've got a 1731 shilling in virtually mint state with full dusty lustre, but that was hermetically sealed in a Georgian drinking glass base until the glass broke a few years ago, so I cracked it out. (it's the one in the confirmed unlisted varieties section) Actually, you can go back indefinitely in time if a coin was part of a hoard. Greek and Roman coins are regularly found with full originally lustred surfaces

I'd better not take part. I find surveys very stressful and completely pointless. The last one I took part in while waiting for a plane at Manchester Airport annoyed me so much at the cold-call style intrusion that I gave my income as £300K and my social group as E. She stopped writing after the last answer and I was left in peace.

This seems far too complicated e.g. separate fields for each grade unless that is you intend to obtain many examples of the same coin. A lot of the info you have listed isn't something you would want to search which would be the main reason for keeping field data separate. It would be far better to keep most data in a simple file containg all the data you would never need to search. Unless that is you have a system like Declan who can undoubtedly tell me that a coin struck in brass, in VF grade, that cost £2.74, is dated 1914, weighs 4.3g, that has a Spink reference number of 1234, gives you a value of 42. (Sorry Douglas)

Hi Debbie, Rob has said just about everything I could have told you about the coin. And yes, I believe there are only 3 or 4 of the 1844 dated pennies in existence. I also have one of the spelling error (PENNEY instead of PENNY) coins which are fun. One Moore (sorry) thing to add. At least you have the start of a provenance, this coin being the same one as illustrated by David Magnay in Debbie's link (see matching discolouration pattern). If I can remember/find where Magnay sold his model coinage, I'll see if there is any further provenance. I do know they weren't part of his fractionals and 1860 pattern pennies sale at DNW on 3/2/1999.

A pattern penny by Joseph Moore, struck in 1844, though there are also undated pennies and halfpennies which are much more common and can be picked up for a few pounds. The piece in question is a Peck 2088. Joseph Moore was a Birmingham die sinker who alos produced a number of patterns dated 1860. The model coins were produced in considerable numbers and found favour with the public who had to carry around the heavy mint pennies in the normal course of trade. The diameter for the model pennies is 22.5mm compared to 34 for the mint product. They are also thinner. They were so popular that the mint had to dislaim any responsibility for them.

Yes but, as I said, many coins like this are found each year that are 'unique' with regards to new types, new moneyers, new combinations, etc. I don't see them on the website. To fill in the missing words for all those who are unaware. North (1994) has William I coins struck at Gloucester in types 1-3,5,7 & 8. This is a sword (type 6) penny. The other gap was a two sceptres, which if I remember rightly there was a cracked example by the same moneyer on eBay last summer. Not sure how many others there are though - Clive?.

Copies are usually made from tin or tin alloy. It has a ring which is not out of sorts. Some casts give a dull clunk when you tap them, but others sound more realistic. Even within genuine coins you get a variation in the ring.

Any chance of a scan of the receipt which would say who the buyer was? I will hazard a guess and say it was part of Montagu's milled coinage (from George I onwards) which was sold off by Spink in 1890. There is a nice catalogue of the sale which contained many patterns and proofs. A priced and named copy sold at DNW for about £500 hammer a few years ago. Tight a***d me only bid four, which I've regretted to this day. It won't be a proof set per se as in the usual mint output, just a trio of the three bronze denominations.

It is in your interest to use acid-free tickets. If in doubt, ask the supplier.

The silver price doesn't come into this one. Half an ounce of silver for a halfcrown is only a tenner or so melt which pales into insignificance when the coin sells for hundreds. Anyway, you happily paid about 50x melt for your short or long cross penny (whichever it was), so you can hardly complain about the Ag price causing a problem because that too was way over melt.

I think those seem only recently recognised as seriously scarce, so any example is a good investment. A decent provenance is always an attractive addition. The provenance of the shilling was nice too, but even if I had the money I just don't know if I could justify quite that much given I too have an acceptable example ... Although the Briot is roughly 15-20% over Spink prices, it is the same price as the one on the CNG site for $2450 which also has an excellent provenance (Cumberland Clark, H L Farquhar, Dupree, GS Hopkins and Pritchard), but is nowhere near as nice. The latter was in Lockdales about 18 months ago with a description of unlisted type in Spink and an estimate of £30-50. I bid £720, but it went to CNG for £800 or 820, can't remember which, so at least three people were awake. That one is worth £1K, not £1500, but the Morrieson, Lockett and Asherson one is a much better coin. I suspect it is also Murdoch 135, but can't prove it because it was bought by Spink and no provenance is given in the Morrieson catalogue. I wanted it for an example of the triangle over anchor mark to get away from shillings of which I have half a dozen. The design variation was also attractive. The mules are definitely commoner.

I was mulling over that one too, but as I have one decided not to. Did get the Briot hammered halfcrown though with the excellent provenance.

Keep collecting and investment separate as the two are incompatible. Collect the things you appreciate and wish to build on, buy silver as an investment as and how you see fit. You might want to assemble a collection of a dozen crowns and that might take a couple years to find. You might buy a dozen crowns for their bullion content, but have to sell them the same day to take advantage of a spike in the silver price, or alternatively you find the price paid is never reached again and you are sitting on a permanent potential loss. Collecting is not a day to day buying and selling activity, or at least not if done with a set of predetermined parameters. Pay any amount for bullion as an investment and it is as you say, a gamble. Your call.

Sounds like a laminating flan where a bit peels off, possibly due to an inclusion of some sort in the metal when the bar was made. Trapped air or a different material would do it.

Excellent, in that case please can you contribute to my request for pictures of Charles I coins associated with the Carey commission? It is in the same section of the forum, a few threads away from this one and gives a list of what I need. Thanks.

The only time I went in was for an hour on spec as I had a coin which I wanted to compare with theirs. They accommodated me, which surprised me somewhat. They bought out the tray(s) with the relevant coins while someone stayed in the room. Any coins you take with you will be weighed in advance to ensure you don't exchange them, but they are allowed in which is good if you need to compare dies. A down side though is if you want images of any of their coins as has been mentioned before. £50 for a uniface or £60 for an image both sides is simply too much for your average collector which has to be paid for in advance and arrives in the fullness of time.

I need pictures of two Oxford halfcrowns. Morrieson 1644 types C3 and C4 with the billet stops on the reverse if anyone can help. Thanks. I have a picture of Adams 192 (C3) already which is probably illustrated in Bull.

Console yourself that British coins are cheaper than US coins. The most expensive was the Edward III double florin that made £460K in June 2006.

Gulp... Ok I am framing this response for the next time the wife looks over my shoulder at my next acquisition Some people wouldn't pay more than 99p on ebay for a coin or live their lives searching the 50p bins whereas some pay a six figure sum or even more. Why assume this forum is any different? We are a broad cross section of collecting society and it's each to their own. As long as your priorities are to provide the basics for your family and dependants and that is covered, the surplus is disposable income/savings to be spent in any way you or your partner chooses or not. In the case of the above sum, £4500 will buy a nice coin, but there is an ever increasing list of things that it won't. As long as it is within your means, £45.00 or £4500 is irrelevant. Of course you can spend what you wish to, it's your money, it was just interesting to see how different people go about their hobby. Didn't mean to irritate you. Doesn't irritate me, just that some people like to keep their cards close to their chest and might feel the question a little intrusive.

Gulp... Ok I am framing this response for the next time the wife looks over my shoulder at my next acquisition Some people wouldn't pay more than 99p on ebay for a coin or live their lives searching the 50p bins whereas some pay a six figure sum or even more. Why assume this forum is any different? We are a broad cross section of collecting society and it's each to their own. As long as your priorities are to provide the basics for your family and dependants and that is covered, the surplus is disposable income/savings to be spent in any way you or your partner chooses or not. In the case of the above sum, £4500 will buy a nice coin, but there is an ever increasing list of things that it won't. As long as it is within your means, £45.00 or £4500 is irrelevant.