TomGoodheart
-
Posts
4,270 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
47
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Articles
Posts posted by TomGoodheart
-
-
And.. thanks! That worked!
-
Can you identify these @Chris Perkins?
-
48 minutes ago, Chris Perkins said:
Can you show me a screenshot or shots of exactly what it says and where it goes wrong?
Obviously you can't post them here so would have to email. Unless attaching the long way round works.
I did this through uploading to Gallery Images. But that presumably that uses Forum memory and is a bit clunky .. -
OK, let's try a different browser .. Drag and .. Nope.
Doesn't work for me on Chrome or Opera @Chris Perkins :(
-
Oh well, if we're doing medals .. let's see if this works.
No. Doesn't work for me @Chris Perkins
Says I can't paste images directly. I have to upload or insert from a url ..
-
I got one of those too! 😄
-
1
-
-
On 9/29/2025 at 10:29 PM, blakeyboy said:
"This is a testament to your test reply of someone's test" , he replied testily.
😂
-
This is a test ..
-
I thought I'd just mention I bought from Stacks Bowers in the US a couple of weeks ago. Paid by credit card for a 2.5% supplement.
Got an email on Thursday saying it was being shipped and would be delivered yesterday. Some hope I thought, but .. slight delay because I missed the request to pay the vat (correct amount and reasonable fee from FedEx of £4 - rather cheaper than Royal Mail!) but it arrived this morning.
So things can go right (I wasn't sure how it would go as you occasionally hear of problems with US posted items) and in this case I actually received the coin faster than from some UK auction houses!-
2
-
-
On 8/18/2025 at 4:28 PM, Paddy said:
Interestingly my email to Chris has just bounced back after "repeated attempts to deliver" and a lot of other error messages indicating server failure at predecimal.com.
I've emailed Chris too, quoting part of this message Paddy. Let's see if it gets to him, though I believe it's the site host that's looking into the problems ...
-
But I get a 403 error when I try to post a picture ...
-
1
-
-
Just checking if I can actually post anything. .. ok, that worked.
-
That seller always has really high contrast photographs, which I feel don't do his offerings any justice. I suspect it's a decent enough coin in the hand.
But top pops are always a bit dodgy unless the coin is really common, since there are bound to be better examples of 99% of coins on ebay out there somewhere, and only a fraction get graded so it's all a bit meaningless to most British collectors IMHO.
And of course, it's always 'buy the coin, not the slab' with these .. -
It's a very kind offer dmw, though I'm not sure if this is the ideal place for it. But maybe one of the members knows someone that might like them.
I suspect Changechecker works on what you'd need to pay to buy a coin. Most dealers have to charge a minimum of a few quid, just to recoup the admin of packing and postage. For things that are essentially face value it's often only economic for collectors if they're buying in bulk .. see ebay.-
1
-
-
Just wondering if anyone is continuing Gary Oddie's 'Contributors to British Numismatics' section on the BNS website?
Particularly the Coin Tickets listing. The links to send photos are still there, but I don't know if they go anywhere. @Rob? -
The Triangle-in-Circle mark was struck between 15 Jul 1641 and 28 May 1643 H.
Triangle alone that was 4 Jul 1639 - 26 Jun 1640, which might be where the confusion lies.
This is based on the trials of the Pyx dates given in the preface to the Brooker collection book.-
1
-
-
This on the other hand, was personally touched by the king, having been handed to a participant at a royal Touching Ceremony.
The Touch was thought, due to the belief that kings were god's representatives on earth (see Divine Right) to be able to cure a number of illnesses, similar to a saint's intercession. The major one was scrofula, an unpleasant but rarely fatal disease that not infrequently went into remission. The habit appears to have dated from Edward the Confessor and the Stuarts were the last to practice the habit.
Initially the Royal Touch was the main purpose of the ceremony but soon a small payment was added to charitably support the sufferer. From the reign of Edward IV a gold angel was the accepted form this took. An appropriate piece, given the presence of an angel on one side of the coin and the ship of state on the other. Additionally the value of the coin 6/4d was the accepted payment for a doctor at the time.
Angels were officially pierced and the monarch then threaded them onto a length of white silk ribbon, before hanging the coin around the neck of a sufferer. One of the most famous was Dr Samuel Johnson who received his from Queen Anne, the last monarch to Touch. Johnson's touchpiece is now displayed in the British Museum. This is another example I was very pleased to be able to find for my collection. S. 2684A Portcullis privy mark ( 11 Jul 1633 - 27 Jun 1634)
-
5
-
-
There was a trend at the time in Europe for the wealthy and powerful to present visitors, or those they wished to impress, with small portrait medallions. Charles took up the habit with the most prestigious being impressive pieces in gold but also cheaper silver or silver gilt versions. It seems unlikely that all of these were personally handed out by the king. Even at court I imagine others distributed the majority. And it's likely that, since they were cast and chased and therefore relatively easy to duplicate, others were made to order for supporters of the crown who wanted something to demonstrate their loyalty from existing badges, though likely with Royal 'consent' to the practice.
Obviously over time it became riskier to admit you were an ardent Royalist, hence the size of the later badges is much smaller with the one shown on my fingertip an example of one from the later years of the reign that could be easily concealed in clothing or, should the need arise, shown at the turn of a coat collar perhaps.-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, Paddy said:
Wow, some lovely pieces there!
I would love to know more about the badges and medals, particularly the 3 medals, top row, all looking fairly similar and one with the purple ribbon?
The first two are jetons (small medallions, assumed to have been thrown into the crowds) in celebration of Charles and Henrietta Maria's wedding.
They had two wedding ceremonies, due to religious differences. The first was in France (Henrietta Maria was the daughter of Henry IV of France and Marie de' Medici) and Duke Claude of Chevreuse stood as proxy for Charles. A second was held in Canterbury. The jetons were designed by Pierre Regnier.
The one with the ribbon is also by Regnier and was assumed to be a variant of the marriage medallion. However I am certain that, though similar, the crown on the obverse represents their coronation rather than marriage. This is supported by the date on the first two being 1625 (the marriage was in May of that year) but the coronation was in February 1626 and this is the year given on the 'crown' version. This type is considerably rarer than the first two and I was very pleased to pick that one up!
In case it helps, trays sizes are 45mm (larger) and 35mm (smaller). Medals were produced throughout Charles' reign (including posthumously).
Badges (the oval ones) are generally thought to date from the middle of the reign.
As with the shillings, Charles starts the reign wearing a ruff. This gives way to a lace collar, with increasing amounts of armour added to his bust as the years go by!-
4
-
-
And some shillings ..an early Easter egg. 😄
-
6
-
-
Medals
-
5
-
-
20 hours ago, Zo Arms said:
I'll agree with Paddy. Let's have a gander at a few of your medals. And some Tower shillings please.
Every day is a school day and I'm willing to learn.
And if it awakens some latent desire amongst the masses, all the better.
Badges.
-
3
-
-
On 3/21/2025 at 9:41 PM, Zo Arms said:
I'm still here. Check in at least once a day.
Mike once asked me why I didn't contribute more. Told him I didn't have much of interest to say. 😐
I've been buying far more medals than coins of late, which I suspect are not of much interest to members here. And the coins I have are all Tower shillings of Charles I, so again, outside most people's scope. Don't want to be the cause of people's eyes glazing over! 😄
-
2
-
-
Afraid I'm guilty of the 'social media' thing and so here less often.
There are a number of specialised Facebook groups which, while many are set up as a selling platform by the administrator, do get a reasonable amount of traffic. I frequent a specialist group for Charles I coinage and several for hammered and early milled because that's where my interests lie. Probably of little interest to the many(?) penny enthusiasts here, but I've certainly contributed to the Charles I group quite frequently and it's where quite a few of my Charles I contacts congregate..
There are also groups for numismatic literature and historical medals, which again though specialised fall within my interests and a few detectorist groups where I try to identify items. I also admit that I frequent many of these groups to spot potential purchases since there are a number of well known dealers who are also members there. Some, like Tim Medhurst rely heavily on social media (he's primarily on Instagram I believe) and it's not uncommon for things to never reach a dealer's website, having found a buyer on a Facebook group.
I'm not saying that's an ideal situation, it's all too easy to miss something because you don't happen to be a member of a particular group, but I accept that's the way of it (even Spink sell stuff on Facebook now). Plus I'm chronically online anyway, so it's just a few more pages to visit in a day. And if it results in a bit more knowledge, whether a collector ticket identified or a potential contact spotted, a possible new source of material or an item added to the collection, all to the good.-
1
-
Forbidden error when posting attachments
in Forum technical help and support
Posted
It's a 'wound star' - I guess the equivalent of the Purple Heart. He got shrapnel in his eye at Monte Cassino and had to be operated on in the field. (Later went to an optician in London who turned out to have been his surgeon).