dave-lowe Posted March 12, 2014 Posted March 12, 2014 This Charles II Half Crown certainly looks like the rare variety of this date, which reads GRATTA in error. Because it is so worn, it's difficult to be precise. I have looked under a glass, and I can see what looks like the tops of two T's, but is it a "trick of the light" which makes it appear so?Look at both A's and you can see a difference in size to the horizontal bar. I have looked at an angle, and there is a definite bulge where the serif of the "T's" are.I have been collecting over 30 years, and would welcome any comments. Quote
Rob Posted March 12, 2014 Posted March 12, 2014 (edited) It looks like a T, but the grade isn't the best. Attached is what Spink had to say about Adams 346.I think the jury is out until a good well struck example is available. Edited March 12, 2014 by Rob Quote
dave-lowe Posted March 12, 2014 Author Posted March 12, 2014 Very interesting article. Mine certainly does look like the first coin pictured, and it is dated 1679 (couldn't post a picture of the Reverse); the uprights of the letters before the last A look the same as mine. I know it's not in very good condition, but I bought it with THREE other Charles II coins for less than £60; the other two coins are pierced, but it's still incredible value. There is a Sixpence 1678 over 7 and a Twopence of 1679 [the figure before the 9 is flat, but I think it is a 7]. Quote
Peckris Posted March 13, 2014 Posted March 13, 2014 It certainly looks like a T - and the second "T" (i.e. the "I") is much clearer than the first. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.