numismatist Posted June 25, 2013 Posted June 25, 2013 Also wondered if its 1718 over 6 ?. Also I assume that as the E is mainly intactit was struck like this rather than being post striking damage.. What grade doyou give it , and does the flaw de-value it..........Thanks for any advice Quote
numismatist Posted June 25, 2013 Author Posted June 25, 2013 and the Obverse (sorry photos could not be uploaded together due to size) Quote
Peckris Posted June 25, 2013 Posted June 25, 2013 Also wondered if its 1718 over 6 ?. Also I assume that as the E is mainly intactit was struck like this rather than being post striking damage.. What grade doyou give it , and does the flaw de-value it..........Thanks for any adviceIt looks like it's 8 over something and a 6 is as good a candidate as any.I would rate it as being in the range of VF to GVF.The flaw is a strange one. It certainly looks like a striking flaw, but I would not say it disfigures the coin as badly as it would in a different location. As for impact on value, that's in the eye of the beholder - you could get every reaction from "I wouldn't touch it with a bargepole" to "I can live with that". Quote
numismatist Posted June 26, 2013 Author Posted June 26, 2013 Thanks " Peckris " for you imput. Yes its a strange flaw and if there was no letterthere it would look like someone had tried to pierce it . Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.