RENNES Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 Mint-made or not?For this series of coins there is French and Flemish Varietys.For this type " Belgique" the year 1922 doesnt exist.The coin is dated 1905.I'm almost certain this occurred post mint.Any advice would be appreciated.thanks in advance. Quote
Peckris Posted March 3, 2013 Posted March 3, 2013 Certainly done after minting. Possibly in 1922! Quote
RENNES Posted March 3, 2013 Author Posted March 3, 2013 It is interesting considering the only year where no coins were minted from this type "Belgique" was 1922.. Quote
Rob Posted March 4, 2013 Posted March 4, 2013 But the 1922 is a mirror image, so what (presumably) coin was used to impress the new date? Quote
RENNES Posted March 4, 2013 Author Posted March 4, 2013 But the 1922 is a mirror image, so what (presumably) coin was used to impress the new date?I think so. But im not sure. Clearly thats what appears to have happened. But it seems unlikely for example two Cupro nickel coins to strike one another leaving the impression.The impression is quite defined and also the font appears to be from something like 1922 2 french franc coin. The 9 is the giveaway.Maybe the coins were stacked up in a box some force upon the top caused the softer coin to receive the impression. Or someone lined up two coins and hit it with a hammer.After a coin has been struck I thought it would harden the metal..? Quote
Rob Posted March 4, 2013 Posted March 4, 2013 But the 1922 is a mirror image, so what (presumably) coin was used to impress the new date?I think so. But im not sure. Clearly thats what appears to have happened. But it seems unlikely for example two Cupro nickel coins to strike one another leaving the impression.The impression is quite defined and also the font appears to be from something like 1922 2 french franc coin. The 9 is the giveaway.Maybe the coins were stacked up in a box some force upon the top caused the softer coin to receive the impression. Or someone lined up two coins and hit it with a hammer.After a coin has been struck I thought it would harden the metal..?It hasn't happened by accident in a bag. The hammer theory is the most likely option. Quote
RENNES Posted March 4, 2013 Author Posted March 4, 2013 But the 1922 is a mirror image, so what (presumably) coin was used to impress the new date?I think so. But im not sure. Clearly thats what appears to have happened. But it seems unlikely for example two Cupro nickel coins to strike one another leaving the impression.The impression is quite defined and also the font appears to be from something like 1922 2 french franc coin. The 9 is the giveaway.Maybe the coins were stacked up in a box some force upon the top caused the softer coin to receive the impression. Or someone lined up two coins and hit it with a hammer.After a coin has been struck I thought it would harden the metal..?It hasn't happened by accident in a bag. The hammer theory is the most likely option.I would agree Rob. Thanks guys. Its still nice to have in the collection though... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.