del Posted September 12, 2012 Posted September 12, 2012 bought this 'sixpence' dated 1696.nice coin,however on the reverse it is minted on a large flan.the obverse is well struck and fits the coin nicely and seems larger than a normal sixpence.could the obverse be a shilling and the reverse be a sixpence? Quote
del Posted September 12, 2012 Author Posted September 12, 2012 bought this 'sixpence' dated 1696.nice coin,however on the reverse it is minted on a large flan.the obverse is well struck and fits the coin nicely and seems larger than a normal sixpence.could the obverse be a shilling and the reverse be a sixpence?heres a pic of the obverse Quote
Coinery Posted September 12, 2012 Posted September 12, 2012 bought this 'sixpence' dated 1696.nice coin,however on the reverse it is minted on a large flan.the obverse is well struck and fits the coin nicely and seems larger than a normal sixpence.could the obverse be a shilling and the reverse be a sixpence?heres a pic of the obverseWhat weight have you got? Quote
Rob Posted September 12, 2012 Posted September 12, 2012 Spread flan. The force used has been sufficient to impress the design plus displace the metal beyond the boundaries of the dies. Quote
del Posted September 13, 2012 Author Posted September 13, 2012 Spread flan. The force used has been sufficient to impress the design plus displace the metal beyond the boundaries of the dies.That explains the reverse but i see no signs of that on the obverse.the bust and legends are bigger than another sixpence i have Quote
del Posted September 13, 2012 Author Posted September 13, 2012 Spread flan. The force used has been sufficient to impress the design plus displace the metal beyond the boundaries of the dies.That explains the reverse but i see no signs of that on the obverse.the bust and legends are bigger than another sixpence i have Quote
Coinery Posted September 13, 2012 Posted September 13, 2012 Spread flan. The force used has been sufficient to impress the design plus displace the metal beyond the boundaries of the dies.That explains the reverse but i see no signs of that on the obverse.the bust and legends are bigger than another sixpence i haveIf your proposal is that this could be a shilling obverse, sixpence reverse, then the flan would either have to be extremely thin, if it's spread to the dimensions of a shilling, or it's actually a shilling flan, given that the obverse sits on it about right! So, what's the weight? Quote
del Posted September 13, 2012 Author Posted September 13, 2012 Spread flan. The force used has been sufficient to impress the design plus displace the metal beyond the boundaries of the dies.That explains the reverse but i see no signs of that on the obverse.the bust and legends are bigger than another sixpence i haveIf your proposal is that this could be a shilling obverse, sixpence reverse, then the flan would either have to be extremely thin, if it's spread to the dimensions of a shilling, or it's actually a shilling flan, given that the obverse sits on it about right! So, what's the weight?dont know the weight dont have any scales the coin measures 23mm Quote
Rob Posted September 13, 2012 Posted September 13, 2012 Spread flan. The force used has been sufficient to impress the design plus displace the metal beyond the boundaries of the dies.That explains the reverse but i see no signs of that on the obverse.the bust and legends are bigger than another sixpence i haveIf your proposal is that this could be a shilling obverse, sixpence reverse, then the flan would either have to be extremely thin, if it's spread to the dimensions of a shilling, or it's actually a shilling flan, given that the obverse sits on it about right! So, what's the weight?dont know the weight dont have any scales the coin measures 23mmA sixpence is 21mm which bear out the spread flan theory - so at 23mm just over 10% too large. Using the widest diameter on your coin as 23mm, the ratio of coin diameter to the outside of the legend diameter on my screen is 65:56 The corresponding dimensions on my example are 21mm and 19.5mm, so the diameter of the outside of the legend is within 0.3mm for a spread and not spread example. Sixpence it is. The bust goes all the way to the edge on a sixpence. Quote
del Posted September 13, 2012 Author Posted September 13, 2012 Spread flan. The force used has been sufficient to impress the design plus displace the metal beyond the boundaries of the dies.That explains the reverse but i see no signs of that on the obverse.the bust and legends are bigger than another sixpence i haveIf your proposal is that this could be a shilling obverse, sixpence reverse, then the flan would either have to be extremely thin, if it's spread to the dimensions of a shilling, or it's actually a shilling flan, given that the obverse sits on it about right! So, what's the weight?dont know the weight dont have any scales the coin measures 23mmA sixpence is 21mm which bear out the spread flan theory - so at 23mm just over 10% too large. ok so nothing spectacular then.does this spread flan effect the value?thanks rob youve put some effort into thisUsing the widest diameter on your coin as 23mm, the ratio of coin diameter to the outside of the legend diameter on my screen is 65:56 The corresponding dimensions on my example are 21mm and 19.5mm, so the diameter of the outside of the legend is within 0.3mm for a spread and not spread example. Sixpence it is. The bust goes all the way to the edge on a sixpence. Quote
Rob Posted September 13, 2012 Posted September 13, 2012 Spread flan. The force used has been sufficient to impress the design plus displace the metal beyond the boundaries of the dies.That explains the reverse but i see no signs of that on the obverse.the bust and legends are bigger than another sixpence i haveIf your proposal is that this could be a shilling obverse, sixpence reverse, then the flan would either have to be extremely thin, if it's spread to the dimensions of a shilling, or it's actually a shilling flan, given that the obverse sits on it about right! So, what's the weight?dont know the weight dont have any scales the coin measures 23mmA sixpence is 21mm which bear out the spread flan theory - so at 23mm just over 10% too large. ok so nothing spectacular then.does this spread flan effect the value?thanks rob youve put some effort into thisUsing the widest diameter on your coin as 23mm, the ratio of coin diameter to the outside of the legend diameter on my screen is 65:56 The corresponding dimensions on my example are 21mm and 19.5mm, so the diameter of the outside of the legend is within 0.3mm for a spread and not spread example. Sixpence it is. The bust goes all the way to the edge on a sixpence.This won't affect the value which will still be based on the grade and type. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.