Bernard Posted August 21, 2009 Posted August 21, 2009 Elizabeth I’s Shilling, second issue, cross-crosslet (1560-61)Can anyone tell me a how much this is worth? And what grade you would give it?It could do with a clean also.Thank you. Quote
Sylvester Posted August 21, 2009 Posted August 21, 2009 Don't clean it! Cleaning it will reduce the value.Gradewise, well there's still a bit of detail left in the dress, the legends are on the whole fairly crisp, especially the reverse. Taking the scratches into account, i'd be tempted to go for a GF. Quote
scott Posted August 21, 2009 Posted August 21, 2009 looks clean enough alreadybut yea i would go with that grade Quote
Peckris Posted August 21, 2009 Posted August 21, 2009 I would say VF except for the portrait which is only F, so GF seems fair (the portrait is the most important element). It seems to be Second Issue, so value would be £100 - £150, as a rough estimate. Quote
Sylvester Posted August 22, 2009 Posted August 22, 2009 I would say VF except for the portrait which is only F, so GF seems fair (the portrait is the most important element).It's the usual problem with these coins; either the portrait is strong but the legends are badly struck or worse still clipped, or the legends are strong but the portrait is weak. Finding coins with good portrait, good legends that haven't been clipped is the Holy Grail of the Tudor era. Quote
scott Posted August 22, 2009 Posted August 22, 2009 same with most hammered isn't it? due to them being thin Quote
Red Riley Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 I would say VF except for the portrait which is only F, so GF seems fair (the portrait is the most important element). It seems to be Second Issue, so value would be £100 - £150, as a rough estimate.I am not a hammered expert in any way shape or form, but the amount of wear (as opposed to inadequacies caused by the primitive method of striking) appears minimal to me. I would reckon somewhere around very fine, both sides. In any event it is a good deal better than the condition theses things usually turn up in.Sadly, it looks like somebody has already got to it with the Duraglit. Geordie or Clive might be your man. Quote
HistoricCoinage Posted August 29, 2009 Posted August 29, 2009 The reverse on this is very good, I'd say that the reverse is a good VF whereas the obverse, like many Lizzies, is almost VF. I think that the coin is better than the photos suggest and so would give it a VF grade in my opinion.The problems experienced with the Elizabeth I Sixpences and Shillings always seems to be the wear on the portrait. This is probably due to the relief and so I very rarely see Sixpences with superb portraits which is a shame, the Shillings fare slightly better in this respect.Kindest Regards,Clive. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.