Paulus Posted July 8, 2016 Posted July 8, 2016 (edited) Could someone post the correct weight for these please? I have Googled, and tried Tony Clayton's site, Spink, ESC, CCGB and Maberly Phillips to no avail Adthanksvance Edited July 8, 2016 by Paulus Quote
Matteo95 Posted July 8, 2016 Posted July 8, 2016 Do you mean this http://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces16742.html ? Quote
Paulus Posted July 8, 2016 Author Posted July 8, 2016 Just now, Matteo95 said: Do you mean this http://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces16742.html ? Ah yes, thanks Matteo, I forgot about that site! Quote
Rob Posted July 9, 2016 Posted July 9, 2016 26g is a bit vague for a reference weight. They were struck predominantly from 8 Reales which weighed 27.07g according to Krause, but given the host was circulated coinage this number isn't set in stone. It would also differ slightly if something other than an 8R was used, but not necessarily by a significant amount, and given you have no idea what condition the host was in before striking it is not practical to give an exact weight. Quote
Paulus Posted July 9, 2016 Author Posted July 9, 2016 I would expect a weight 'range' Rob, for the reasons you state. The two I have are 26.6 - 26.7 g. However, I'm surprised these are so much less than the weight for a Crown, when the silver content was everything in terms of backing the coin's value, and then it was revalued at 5 shillings and 6d - just a fascinating subject I guess! Quote
Rob Posted July 9, 2016 Posted July 9, 2016 The crown was always heavier than the 8R. at 30g it was 5/-, which is why the original countermarked pieces were tariffed at a lower value. The purity of the silver was also different to our 925. Given the upheaval of the Napoleonic Wars it is somewhat surprising that they issued a new value on a coin. It would have been far simpler to continue with the existing coin and adjust prices to suit even allowing for the shortage of specie. Obviously the Spanish 'donated' a considerable sum to the nation's coffers, and using existing coin of known purity was the easiest solution, bypassing the need to refine the silver. Quote
Paulus Posted July 9, 2016 Author Posted July 9, 2016 Do you know what the silver purity of an 8R was? I'm guessing it "varied" ! Quote
Rob Posted July 9, 2016 Posted July 9, 2016 According to Krause, the portrait types were .903, but the non-portrait types (earlier, say 1740s) were .917 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.