Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was rather disappointed at the state of several of my "winnings" as the coins obviously had been dipped but not mentioned in their descriptions and not obvious from the online pictures I saw - the 1858/9 and the more important 1863/1. Was also true of the 1878 that was part of a two coin lot. Will keep them, but surely demonstrates the importance of either seeing the lots in person or having a representative do so (my usual arrangements fell through).

 

Additionally there were a couple bits that went a bit higher than estimated: the proof 1839s (esp. the "WW") and proof 1867. As a friend of mine rephrased: "shiny sells"! And guilty I was as well for even unwittingly buying a couple of shiny bits

Posted

Shame, they look lovely in the catalogue. I would make DNW aware of your thoughts, looking to the future.

Hopefully they will tone with time. A mate of mine always has a tray of silver basking on his window-sill, reckons it takes a few months depending on weather.

Jerry

Posted

I may at that. The window sill beckons as I'm really not a fan of 
"bright cleaning". I think these coins lose just that little bit of lustre

with cleaning, even dipping - they do not have original mint appearance IMO,

as has been stated, and reasons given many other times (please see Weimar White's book on Coin Chemistry).

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...
Test